E-mail
Share this pageMore small firms drop health care
Posted by Don McCanne MD on Tuesday, May 26, 2009This entry is from Dr. McCanne's Quote of the Day, a daily health policy update on the single-payer health care reform movement. The QotD is archived on PNHP's website.
More Small Firms Drop Health Care
By Dana Mattioli
The Wall Street Journal
May 26, 2009Accelerating health-care premiums and sharp revenue shortfalls due to the recession are forcing some small companies to choose between dropping health insurance or laying off workers — or staying in business at all.
About 10% of small businesses are considering eliminating coverage over the next year, up from 3% in 2005, according to a recent survey by National Small Business Association.
That follows earlier declines in coverage, with just 38% of small businesses providing health insurance last year compared to 61% in 1993, according to the trade group. A Hewitt Associates survey found that 19% of all companies plan to stop providing health-care benefits in the next three to five years.
Rampant health care cost escalation is a problem for everyone. In bad economic times the problems are compounded, threatening the viability of employer-sponsored coverage. Small businesses that operate on very narrow margins have no choice but to reduce health benefits by either shifting more of the health care costs to their employees, or by eliminating health plans altogether. The fault lies not with the small business owners, but with the flawed U.S. system of financing health care.
The recent Medicare trustees report indicates that Medicare is facing similar economic challenges. But there is a very crucial difference. Everyone recognizes that the high costs of Medicare reflect the excessive rate of increases in total health care spending, and that runaway costs must be harnessed. The stewards of Medicare would never consider reducing legitimate health care benefits, or worse, eliminating many Medicare beneficiaries from coverage.
The point is that the structure of the financing system really matters. We can have a system in which individuals or employers are forced by economic circumstances to reduce or eliminate the financing of essential health care services, or we can have a system in which the government is forced by economic circumstances to demand greater efficiency by the health care delivery system so that everyone can have the health care that they need.
Unfortunately, members of Congress are moving forward with a model that will leave individuals and employers financially vulnerable for our health care needs – a patchwork of private plans and public programs that grow ever less affordable for most of us.
The model that would work is a single payer national health program. But last week, after a recital of several options that are still on the table, Sen. Baucus finally admitted, “Just to be honest, (single payer) is not on the table because it cannot pass.”
Hmmm… bad policies can pass but good policies can’t? Is there something wrong with the way Congress operates?
One Response to “More small firms drop health care”
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Subscribe to our blog's RSS feed.
About this blog
Physicians for a National Health Program's blog serves to facilitate communication among physicians and the public. The views presented on this blog are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of PNHP.
News from activists
PNHP Chapters and Activists are invited to post news of their recent speaking engagements, events, Congressional visits and other activities on PNHP’s blog in the “News from Activists” section.
Ken Fabert, MD
May 28th, 2009 at 6:51 pm
If Senator Baucus were REALLY being honest, he would say that single payer is not on the table becuase it doesn’t PAY–for campaign contributions, that is. I heard a similar response from my local Congressman, Jay Inslee– WA 1st (D) who bluntly told me that “the votes aren’t there” for single payer while declining to say why he was unwilling to try to work to garner the votes or even co-sponsor HR 676. While the 59% of physicians and the majority of the electorate that favor single payer may not have the cash to attract politicians’ attention at present, we need to remind them that the de facto corruption that influences policy today can still be surmounted by the electorate. Those who are beholden to special interests and chose to ignore the will of the people on this basic human rights issue will eventually find that indeed, the votes aren’t there for them either.