Health Policy for Activists Category

Although a July 2018 Health Tracking Poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that more than three of four respondents say that single-payer should be considered or is very important or the single most important factor in the upcoming election, powerful corporate forces are already mobilizing against it as they derailed real reform in 2008-2009.

As Americans increasingly suffer under an out of control, profit-driven system and as corporate stakeholders, their CEOs, shareholders and Wall Street revel in their gains, when will we shift our priorities to the needs of patients and their families?

Seniors lose by having to pay higher premiums as they increasingly face bankruptcy because of medical costs despite being on Medicare.

Healthcare will be a lot less expensive for everyone—the government, consumers, providers.  —President Donald Trump (1) The above statement by Donald Trump could not be more uninformed, misguided, and blatantly false. Just one more example of his more than 3,000 documented lies as president. Unfortunately, however, much of conservative thought among policy leaders and economists […]

TrumpCare has begun, not through legislation but through executive action . . . In doing so, it has both the short-term goal (have the federal government do less to help vulnerable citizens) and a long-term goal (sabotage ObamaCare, so that Congress can more easily repeal the law.)

Whatever his mental health diagnoses, Trump is a danger to our democracy, and his presidency appears to be unsustainable given the corruption from the top down in the White House and Cabinet appointees. How can he survive the Mueller investigation, revelations about his own sexual misconduct, the $130,000 hush money, and the scandals surrounding his presidency that many now agree are far worse than Watergate?

Government assistance to help lower income people access medical care has been a national goal for more than 50 years under an ongoing societal contract. Supporters of these new regressive policies subscribe to the unfounded belief that people needing Medicaid are lazy or otherwise undeserving of needed medical care. But such an attitude is at once unfair, uncaring, and uninformed.

Bottom line on this merger frenzy—it’s all about giving health care organizations and facilities even more ability to grow their patient base and increase their profits. We have no reason to believe that health care costs will be reined in or that quality of care will improve.

The bottom line is: in the face of rapidly rising health care costs with no containment in sight, we will need Medicaid more than ever before. Without it, there will be no safety net for a large part of our population.

An under-appreciated time bomb of block grants to states for Medicaid and other safety net programs is a constant thread within budget plans going forward in Congress and the Trump administration. This is likely to happen soon and have big impacts on the 75 million Americans now covered by Medicaid, many of whom gained this […]

About this blog

Physicians for a National Health Program's blog serves to facilitate communication among physicians and the public. The views presented on this blog are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of PNHP.

News from activists

PNHP Chapters and Activists are invited to post news of their recent speaking engagements, events, Congressional visits and other activities on PNHP’s blog in the “News from Activists” section.

Archives