Tory plans for NHS privatisation released during parliamentary recess
By Alex Scott-Samuel
The BMJ, August 5, 2016
July 2016 saw the very quiet publication of two key documents charting the route to the privatisation of the NHS in England. Firstly, from NHS England, came Strengthening Financial Performance and Accountability in 2016-17. This is the latest set of instructions on the implementation of NHS chief executive Simon Stevens’s Five Year Forward View (5YFV).
The 5YFV is increasingly coming to resemble one of Stalin’s Five Year Plans from the 1950s. As the new guidance makes clear, Stevens’s latest collectivisation strategy, the Sustainability and Transformation Plans (STPs), is being rigidly imposed across England.
My alternative title for the guidance document would be “Policing the government’s privatisation plans.” Having constructed, with help from the Treasury, a universal set of NHS trust financial deficits based on arbitrarily imposed cash limits, NHS England is now using those deficits to legitimise impossibly tight controls on hospital trusts, clinical commissioning groups (CCGs), and other NHS agencies to ensure they conform to central proposals for cuts and mergers between NHS institutions.
At the same time, private sector and insurance friendly “new models of care” are being imposed in community settings, further undermining NHS hospitals. The ultimate intended outcomes of this massive, dictatorial reorganisation process are privatisation, co-payments, charges, and insurance funded care.
These intentions are made clearer in a second policy paper, similarly released during the parliamentary recess when it is least likely to be noticed: the NHS Improvement Business Plan 2016/17. The plan states that providers will be required “to transform services in line with the 5YFV and this will include making use of new care models and innovative organisational forms.” A priority for 2016/17 is “to facilitate independent sector providers to form NHS partnerships.”
We are told that: “We intend to bring together the most promising potential areas for formal collaboration between NHS Improvement, providers, independent sector partners, NHS England, and other key stakeholders into a new work programme. The key elements of this programme in the first instance will examine the opportunities in the areas of:
- mainstreaming clinical capacity for elective, outpatient, and diagnostic care;
- joint ventures and/or outsourcing of new, novel, or restructured clinical services;
- joint ventures and novel financing for facilities and/or technology;
- independent sector management models to support capability and leadership challenges.”
In other words, before the end of the 2016-17 financial year, we will see the new Conservative government start to impose the large scale privatisation of clinical services, foreshadowed in the Health and Social Care Act 2012. In the event of any doubts regarding the obligatory nature of these policies, the NHS England report referred to earlier makes it clear that “special measures” (central takeover of local management) will be imposed if agencies fail to balance the books or deviate in any way from the government’s plans.
In this context, it’s ironic to recall all the fluffy political spin about “putting GPs in the driving seat” when CCGs were launched in 2012. By contrast, we are now told by NHS England that CCGs that fail to follow Stevens’s diktat will be disbanded and/or forced to become US style accountable care organisations (ACOs). This is with the aim of promoting mergers, cuts, and closures in the publicly provided NHS and introducing community based “integrated packages of care,” which are readily amenable to private sector provision and insurance funding—as occurs in the US ACOs on which this particular “new model of care” is based.
It is no coincidence that the House of Lords is currently calling for evidence to be submitted to its new select committee on the long term sustainability of the NHS.
This inquiry, supported by government ministers, is likely to make recommendations that will legitimise the aims of Stevens’s five year plan, including the “inevitability” of top-ups, co-payments, charges, and of the short term personal health budgets and longer term health insurance system that would be required to fund them. This toxic combination of an increasingly insurance based and increasingly privately provided health service will signal the final dismantling of what was once our National Health Service in England—a horrific and destructive act, which we now know to have been first proposed by Prime Minister Theresa May’s predecessor Margaret Thatcher in 1982.
By Don McCanne, M.D.
We’ve been concerned for some time about the privatization of England’s National Health Service. The process is now underway. The Tory government is threatening the conversion of their delivery system into US style accountable care organizations, ignoring the fact that they have failed to improve quality or control costs. As we stumble along with our grossly inadequate efforts to reform our system, we can learn from the British how not to do it, which, as we see, bears an uncanny resemblance to what we are already doing.