HJM readers are, unsurprisingly, well-informed and articulate. Our recent solicitation of ideas yielded a profusion of cogent observations and opinions. I did my best to organize them, without judgement. Thus, HJM readers can get a sense for the range of views, both widely shared and unique.
I summarize responses by category. If you want to scan all summarized comments, see below.
More input is welcome, but I canât guarantee that Iâll report back. If youâre eager to connect with someone expressing a specific idea, I can explore linking readers âŠ
For Most Vexing / Motivating Current Problems, the most common views were unsurprising: high costs, for individuals and employers; complexity leading to confusion and inefficiency; and widespread profit-seeking by insurers and others. The rich are doing fine, the middle class and especially the poor not so much. Critical provider capacity suffers and improvised solutions (eg value-based payment) donât help. Itâs shameful that the US lacks state-of-the-art insurance.
Current Political Context: Harm vs Advance Single Payer elicited the the central role of economic status: the governing GOP reduces taxes for the rich and cuts government programs intended to help the middle class and poor. There is some optimism in growing condemnation of this dynamic. On broader politics, some readers are pessimistic about both parties, with huge money in politics. More upbeat, one reader noted âcollectivismâ counteracting the famous US ârugged individualismâ. For health care, the rising sense of crisis encounters extensive anti-SP efforts by the profit-makers.
And, finally, for Strategic & Tactical Ideas ⊠strategic views run the gamut: step-wise (eg expanding Medicare age and state-based single payer) to all-at-once. Tactics can be summarized as lots & varied & mutually supportive, from mass movements to fireside chats, moral suasion and technical details. Trumpâs chutzpah and audacity â his disrespect for normal process, get surprise mention as a model for aggressively pursuing single payer. Framing focuses on universality, cost savings, and ending profiteering. âPremiumsâ is preferred to âtaxesâ. Finally, technical suggestions focus on fee-for-service and a tiny role for private supplemental insurance.
Many thanks to the HJM readers who chimed in so thoughtfully. These views rounded out my understanding of options and choices we face on the path to health justice.
1) Most Vexing / Motivating Current Problems
Health Insurance Failures
- High costs â for individuals & employers (esp public) â 7
- Un- and Under-insurance
- Difficulty navigating insurance and care
- Care denials
- Inequality â poor suffer, rich do well
- Medicaid â prove poverty now 2x / year, low payments
- Shameful US lacks state-of-the-art insurance
- Key provider capacity loss
Causes
- Complexity â> confusion & inefficiency â 6
- Profit seeking (insurance, provider groups) â 7
- Patients seen as widgets
- False solutions eg value-based payment
2) Current Political Context: Harm vs Advance Single Payer
Central role of economic status
- GOP cuts: taxes for the rich & government programs
- Wealth to rich, others losing economic stability
- Growing perception that oligarchy = theft
- Middle / upper class must suffer to move the needle
Other political issues
- Govt swings between extremes
- However, both parties fail us
- Money in politics
- Dems in opposition must articulate vision
- Wide fear of taxes, esp for the common good
- The ârugged individualismâ vs âcollectivismâ split is shifting
- Trump shows: Exec Branch can get stuff done if it wants
Regarding Insurance
- Growing perception of a health care crisis
- Relative satisfaction with Medicare (& Soc Security)
- Inevitable strong anti-SP marketing by profit-makers
- Dem Congress may support SP
3) Strategic / Tactical Ideas
Strategy
- None that will work (pessimism)
- State-by-state if fed cooperation â 3
- Lower Medicare age to 50 â 3
- Start with universal capitated primary care
- All-at-once, to reveal the savings â 2
- What would employers like?
- Inside-Outside (legislation + mass movement)
- Outreach + marketing, fireside chats
- Tactic (eg moral vs technical design) tailored to constituency
- Role of SP in the broader Left
- Trumpian chutzpah (audacity of audacity)
- Charismatic president âram SP down countryâs throatâ
Framing
- Universal Coverage ⊠One people, one plan â 2
- Universal coverage costs less for families than now â 3
- Americans trained to believe govt canât deliver â 2
- Affordability + Abundance
- End profiteering
- Contrast with war spending
- Moral imperative currently weak argument
- âSocialized medicineâ trope losing shock value
- Govt pays for health care, not for insurance â 2
- Delink from work
- âPremiumsâ not ââtaxesâ
Technical
- Fee-for-service like Trad. Medicare
- Medicare QMB for low income
- Private Insurance â for supplemental coverage
https://healthjusticemonitor.org…
Stay informed! Subscribe to the McCanne Health Justice Monitor to receive regular policy updates via email, and be sure to follow them on Twitter @HealthJustMon.