By Kate Sheridan
Newsweek, March 21, 2018
The effect that unexpected hospital bills have on Americansā decisions to declare bankruptcy may be overstated, an article published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine claimsābut one expert says the new numbers donāt show the whole picture.
Researchers looked at credit reports of more than 500,000 people who were admitted to a hospital in California between 2003 and 2007. About 4 percent of all the bankruptcies that happened between 2002 and 2011 appeared to be related to a hospitalizationāeven among people who were uninsured, for whom the rate was still only 6 percent.
People did seem more likely to declare bankruptcy after going to a hospitalābut not by all that much, the study found. āRates of medical bankruptcy are much, much lower than we had thought and has been claimed,ā Amy Finkelstein, a health economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and one of the authors of the paper, told Newsweek.
Thatās not to say medical bankruptcies arenāt happeningāfour percent is more than zero. But Finkelstein and her colleagues believe focusing on bankruptcy may be missing the forest for one relatively rare tree. āWe find that going to a hospital is associated with a 20 percent decline in employment and earnings over the next four years. Thatās just extraordinarily high,ā she said, referencing another recent paper. āAnd this is even for people with health insurance.ā
Thatās because health insurance doesnāt cover some of the consequences of being sick, like missing workāwhich exist even in places where health insurance coverage is stronger and more widespread. ā[Other researchers found] similar adverse effects on earnings and employments in Denmark,ā Finkelstein said. āBut the big difference is that in Denmark, most of that lost earnings and employment is insured through things like sick pay and disability insurance.ā
That helps explain why bankruptcy is still a problem in the United States, even if itās smaller than we once thought; while the Affordable Care Act may have patched some holes in the social safety net by expanding Medicaid eligibility to cover more people, disability insurance and unemployment insurance is still weak.
āWeāve had a major push for health insurance coverage in the United States, and much of it was predicated on these claims,ā Finkelstein said. āAnd it turns out that that was the wrong problem to be focusing on.ā
Dr. David Himmelstein disagreesāin his eyes, Finkelstein and her teamās methods donāt really capture medical bankruptcy. Himmelstein, a professor at Hunter Collegeās School of Urban Public Health in New York City, published his own estimate in 2009 in the American Journal of Medicine; one of his co-authors on that paper is now-Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). By their estimate, nearly two-thirds of all bankruptcies are due to medical expenses. For that paper, they surveyed people who had filed bankruptcy and asked them if medical problems forced them to file.
The advantage of Finkelsteinās approachāhaving years of real-life data, linking bankruptcies and hospitalizations that actually happened rather than asking people for a post hoc explanationāis one of its weakness in Himmelsteinās eyes. āThe question really is, does illness cause bankruptcy. And they only count you as having been ill if you were hospitalized. But we know that a huge number of people who were ill were not hospitalized,ā he said. āTo say that our data is wrong is to say people lied.ā
He’s also concerned that Finkelstein and her team’s analysis, which looked only at people who had only been hospitalized once in a three year time period, leaves out a group of particularly sick peopleāand potentially a group that’s at the highest risk of a medical bill-related bankruptcy.
Though they may disagree about the numbers, both Himmelstein and Finkelstein agree on one thing: the problem with high medical bills is not necessarily one that health insurance can solve. Though high deductible plans may strain many Americansā savings, the majority of hospital bills are already taken care of by insurance. Strengthening social safety net programs might be able to mitigate the financial impact of serious illnessesāsomething Himmelstein said heād like to see. āIf thatās the result, that would be great,ā he saidābut heās skeptical that Finkelsteinās results will really be interpreted as an endorsement of something like a stronger disability insurance program. āI think itās much more likely that itās going to be used to scoff at the real problems that people have paying for care.ā
Finkelstein, at least, certainly isnāt scoffing. Problems absolutely exist, but āweāre saying, donāt focus on bankruptcy, focus on earnings and employment,” she said. āMy hope, as a researcher, is that policy discussions and policy proposals are based on a better understanding of what the actual problems are.ā
http://www.newsweek.com…