By Kate Sheridan
Newsweek, March 21, 2018
The effect that unexpected hospital bills have on Americansâ decisions to declare bankruptcy may be overstated, an article published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine claimsâbut one expert says the new numbers donât show the whole picture.
Researchers looked at credit reports of more than 500,000 people who were admitted to a hospital in California between 2003 and 2007. About 4 percent of all the bankruptcies that happened between 2002 and 2011 appeared to be related to a hospitalizationâeven among people who were uninsured, for whom the rate was still only 6 percent.
People did seem more likely to declare bankruptcy after going to a hospitalâbut not by all that much, the study found. âRates of medical bankruptcy are much, much lower than we had thought and has been claimed,â Amy Finkelstein, a health economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and one of the authors of the paper, told Newsweek.
Thatâs not to say medical bankruptcies arenât happeningâfour percent is more than zero. But Finkelstein and her colleagues believe focusing on bankruptcy may be missing the forest for one relatively rare tree. âWe find that going to a hospital is associated with a 20 percent decline in employment and earnings over the next four years. Thatâs just extraordinarily high,â she said, referencing another recent paper. âAnd this is even for people with health insurance.â
Thatâs because health insurance doesnât cover some of the consequences of being sick, like missing workâwhich exist even in places where health insurance coverage is stronger and more widespread. â[Other researchers found] similar adverse effects on earnings and employments in Denmark,â Finkelstein said. âBut the big difference is that in Denmark, most of that lost earnings and employment is insured through things like sick pay and disability insurance.â
That helps explain why bankruptcy is still a problem in the United States, even if itâs smaller than we once thought; while the Affordable Care Act may have patched some holes in the social safety net by expanding Medicaid eligibility to cover more people, disability insurance and unemployment insurance is still weak.
âWeâve had a major push for health insurance coverage in the United States, and much of it was predicated on these claims,â Finkelstein said. âAnd it turns out that that was the wrong problem to be focusing on.â
Dr. David Himmelstein disagreesâin his eyes, Finkelstein and her teamâs methods donât really capture medical bankruptcy. Himmelstein, a professor at Hunter Collegeâs School of Urban Public Health in New York City, published his own estimate in 2009 in the American Journal of Medicine; one of his co-authors on that paper is now-Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). By their estimate, nearly two-thirds of all bankruptcies are due to medical expenses. For that paper, they surveyed people who had filed bankruptcy and asked them if medical problems forced them to file.
The advantage of Finkelsteinâs approachâhaving years of real-life data, linking bankruptcies and hospitalizations that actually happened rather than asking people for a post hoc explanationâis one of its weakness in Himmelsteinâs eyes. âThe question really is, does illness cause bankruptcy. And they only count you as having been ill if you were hospitalized. But we know that a huge number of people who were ill were not hospitalized,â he said. âTo say that our data is wrong is to say people lied.â
He’s also concerned that Finkelstein and her team’s analysis, which looked only at people who had only been hospitalized once in a three year time period, leaves out a group of particularly sick peopleâand potentially a group that’s at the highest risk of a medical bill-related bankruptcy.
Though they may disagree about the numbers, both Himmelstein and Finkelstein agree on one thing: the problem with high medical bills is not necessarily one that health insurance can solve. Though high deductible plans may strain many Americansâ savings, the majority of hospital bills are already taken care of by insurance. Strengthening social safety net programs might be able to mitigate the financial impact of serious illnessesâsomething Himmelstein said heâd like to see. âIf thatâs the result, that would be great,â he saidâbut heâs skeptical that Finkelsteinâs results will really be interpreted as an endorsement of something like a stronger disability insurance program. âI think itâs much more likely that itâs going to be used to scoff at the real problems that people have paying for care.â
Finkelstein, at least, certainly isnât scoffing. Problems absolutely exist, but âweâre saying, donât focus on bankruptcy, focus on earnings and employment,” she said. âMy hope, as a researcher, is that policy discussions and policy proposals are based on a better understanding of what the actual problems are.â
http://www.newsweek.com…