Originally Published April 8, 2006
Des Moines Register Editorial Board
On Tuesday, the Massachusetts Legislature passed a bill mandating all residents purchase health insurance. The philosophy is right: Everyone should have health insurance. It should be affordable. When people are uninsured, everyone pays.
But it’s difficult to get too excited about what Massachusetts did to cover its roughly 550,000 uninsured residents. The bill requires businesses to offer insurance or face financial penalties, but it doesn’t guarantee that insurance be adequate. Individuals must buy insurance or face tax penalties, but it doesn’t define what “affordable” health insurance means. It expands health care for lower-income residents, but much of the money comes from shuffling
existing dollars.
Worst of all, it mandates residents participate in a dysfunctional system that largely ties health care to employment. Every other industrialized country in the world knows it’s a bad idea to tie health care to jobs. It kills entrepreneurial spirit, saddles business with huge costs and forces employers to choose between their bottom lines and the best health policies for workers.
The Massachusetts bill also funnels even more dollars to private insurance companies that may waste money on administration. According to a 2003 Harvard Medical School study, nearly one-third of all U.S. health-care expenditures goes to administration and bureaucracy. That includes insurance-company paper pushers and all the people doctors offices employ to navigate the thousands of insurance plans.
Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who is considering a run for president, has boasted that the plan gets everyone covered without new taxes or a government takeover.
Yet when it comes to health care, the government is hardly the enemy. Indeed, it may be the best hope.
Medicare provides uniform coverage with low administrative costs for more than 40 million seniors and disabled people. Though it needs some fixing, a Medicare-like system for everyone would be more efficient and use fewer dollars on administration than private insurance.
Given the inaction on health-care reform at the federal level, state legislatures are trying to take on the job. While the desire by Massachusetts lawmakers to cover everyone is philosophically right, the approach isn’t.
The fix has to come from a different group of lawmakers – the ones in Washington.
