This study, authored by PNHP president Adam Gaffney, M.D., M.P.H. and PNHP co-founders Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., M.P.H. and David Himmelstein, M.D. was published online in the International Journal of Health Services on June 9, 2020. Click HERE to read the study on the SAGE Journals website.

Abstract

While the COVID-19 pandemic presents every nation with challenges, the United States’ underfunded public health infrastructure, fragmented medical care system, and inadequate social protections impose particular impediments to mitigating and managing the outbreak. Years of inadequate funding of the nation’s federal, state, and local public health agencies, together with mismanagement by the Trump administration, hampered the early response to the epidemic. Meanwhile, barriers to care faced by uninsured and underinsured individuals in the US could deter COVID-19 care and hamper containment efforts, and lead to adverse medical and financial outcomes for infected individuals and their families, particularly for those from disadvantaged groups. While the US has a relatively generous supply of ICU beds and most other health care infrastructure, such medical resources are often unevenly distributed or deployed, leaving some areas ill-prepared for a severe respiratory epidemic. These deficiencies and shortfalls have stimulated a debate about policy solutions. Recent legislation, for instance, expanded coverage for testing for COVID-19 for the uninsured and underinsured, and additional reforms have been proposed. However comprehensive healthcare reform, e.g. via national health insurance, is needed to provide full protection to American families during the COVID-19 outbreak, and in its aftermath.

---

As of this writing, the United States is experiencing the world’s largest COVID-19 outbreak.¹ Deaths are continuing to rise, and the hospital infrastructure of some cities has been severely strained. While every country faces unique challenges responding to this serious public health threat,^2,3 the US’ underfunded public health infrastructure, fragmented medical care system, and paltry social protections have imposed particular impediments to control and mitigation of the epidemic.

As US policymakers contend with the widespread dissemination of COVID-19, addressing the structural weaknesses of the US public health and healthcare financing system — particularly for disadvantaged groups — must be a priority, both for this epidemic and the next. In this article, we explore how underfunding of the nation’s public health agencies impaired the early response to the epidemic; how financial barriers that obstruct care for many in the US healthcare system could hamper efforts to contain it moving forward; the adverse financial ramifications for patients from the outbreak; and potential policies to ameliorate health financing deficiencies in the months and years ahead.

1. Underfunded Public Health

Federal, state and local public health agencies are the frontline defense against novel epidemics. Years of inadequate funding of these agencies, however, has hampered the nation’s response to the outbreak.

Despite nominal increases in public health spending over the past decade, there has been a progressive decline in such funding as a proportion of total health spending⁴ (Figure 1).⁵ Certain agencies and spending areas have seen particularly notable cuts. The budget of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), for instance, fell by about 10% (accounting for inflation) between 2010 and 2019, while CDC spending on state/local emergency preparedness fell by about a third from 2003 to 2019.⁶ The Prevention and Public Health Fund, a pool of public health funds established by the Affordable Care Act to help support state and local public health agencies, has seen multiple cuts since its creation.⁶ As budgets’ have grown tighter, state and local public health agencies have experienced a major decline in staffing, shedding some 50,000 personnel since 2008.⁷

Steps taken by the Trump administration further undercut the nation’s infectious disease readiness, including leaving some 700 staff position at the CDC unfulfilled during the 2017 hiring freeze⁸ and disbanding the office focused on federal pandemic preparedness.⁹ While the full story of the disastrous rollout of diagnostic testing has not yet been fully told, chronic underfunding of public health agencies appears to have left the nation ill-prepared for the arrival of the epidemic. For instance, case and contact tracing — measures that have been successfully deployed in nations such as Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore,^2,10 and that controlled the 2002-03 SARDS outbreak^11-13 — were quickly abandoned in the US, as local health agencies became overwhelmed.¹⁴ Efforts to renew such efforts are currently underway in certain states, notably Massachusetts, but these are exceptions to the rule.

2. COVID-19 and Healthcare Affordability: Implications for Disease Control, Health, and Family Finances

In March 2020, as widespread dissemination of the novel coronavirus became obvious, case identification and contact tracing rapidly gave way to broad social distancing measures, including stay-at-home orders and closures of non-essential businesses, aimed at “flattening the epidemic curve.”^3,15 Even if ultimately effective, epidemiologists predict that the outbreak will recrudesce once social distancing measures are eased, an eventuality that might be ameliorated or prevented through ramped up testing, case finding, and contact tracing. Such an intervention, however, requires a high-performing, and readily accessible, health system.²

Yet 30 million Americans, 9% of the population, had no health coverage before the epidemic,¹⁶ while 44 million more were underinsured — i.e. had coverage that required high copays, deductibles, or other out-of-pocket expenses.¹⁷ Overall, about a quarter of non-elderly adults were either uninsured, or avoided seeing a doctor in a given year because of costs, with (as shown in Figure 2) especially high rates in some states, such as Texas and Florida. As the economy spirals and millions of individuals are thrown out of work, the number of Americans uninsured or otherwise unable to afford care for COVID-19 will soar. News outlets carried stories early in the outbreak about patients with suspected coronavirus infections hit by “surprise” bills from hospitals, adding up to thousands of dollars.^18-21 Although the widespread inaccessibility of coronavirus testing has thus far been the major bottleneck in the US, fear of costs could keep many infected patients from care in the future, hampering the case identification efforts needed to contain an outbreak. To address this likelihood, Congress passed the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, signed into law by President Trump on March 18. The law expands coverage of testing (and associated visits) both for the uninsured and those with copays and deductibles, which could alleviate such fears for some.

This measure, however, only covers the cost of testing — not treatment.  As described in greater depth below, the Trump administration has also promised to use bailout funds to compensate hospitals for the costs of treated uninsured individuals with COVID-19. Such protection, however, is likely to be inadequate, and some individuals will no doubt still be deterred from obtaining medical care. Indeed, a poll conducted in early April found that 14% of Americans said they would avoid medical care due to cost if they developed symptoms consistent with COVID-19; the proportion was even higher among ethnic minorities and those with low incomes.²² Those who remain undiagnosed because they fear the financial consequences of a trip to the hospital may continue to go to work, attend school, or use public transportation, furthering spread. Lack of federally-mandated paid sick-leave is also likely to impede disease mitigations efforts. In 2019, about a quarter of civilian workers lacked paid sick leave, and the rate is substantially higher among those in service occupations.²³ Staying home may not be financially tenable for some such individuals. As will be discussed later, new legislation expanded sick pay benefits for some American workers — but left millions out.

High healthcare costs could also threaten the health of patients infected with COVID-19. Fear of incurring out-of-pocket costs frequently deters patients from seeking urgently needed healthcare, even for “high-severity” conditions like acute asthma²⁴ and myocardial infarction.²⁵ Uninsured patients presenting to US emergency rooms with pneumonia or exacerbations of obstructive lung disease (potential COVID-19 symptoms) are more likely than those with insurance to be discharged home instead of admitted to hospital, likely reflecting patients’ desire to avoid ruinous bills and hospitals’ reticence to bear the costs of care.²⁶ It is plausible that individuals with severe COVID-19 who nevertheless avoid medical care could suffer cardiopulmonary arrest in their homes. A surge in the number of patients found dead in their homes by paramedics in New York City during the outbreak suggests that many individuals with COVID-19 are dying before arriving to the hospital.²⁷ However, it is unknown whether lack of healthcare access could have been a contributing factor in some or any of these deaths.

Yet even if inadequate coverage causes no physical harm, however, it can still inflict “financial toxicity.”²⁸ For those with employer-sponsored insurance, the average cost of a hospitalization for pneumonia for patients with complications and co-morbidities was $20,292 in 2018, some of which may have to be paid out-of-pocket in the form of a deductible.²⁹ Elderly patients with Medicare coverage, many on low fixed incomes, also face deductibles exceeding a $1,000 for a pneumonia hospitalization.³⁰ Those facing severe protracted critical illness, however, may face even higher costs. A recent study found that out-of-pocket costs in the last year of life for the uninsured requiring ICU care averaged more than $26,000.³¹ Even for the insured these costs are often substantial, averaging $10,022 for those with private coverage.³¹ Such sums could be ruinous to the 4 in 10 US adults who are unable to cover even a $400 expense in the event of an emergency.³² Those unable to pay can face lawsuits, home foreclosure, and bankruptcy proceedings when hospitals seek to recover unpaid medical debts.^33,34 And many individuals exposed to financial pressures from COVID-19-related medical costs may be forced to skimp on other important household expenses, such as rent or food, risking downstream deleterious health effects. For many, the financial harms of medical bills will be compounded by lost wages due to job loss, illness, or self-quarantine.

Epidemics tend also to have a disproportionate impact on oppressed populations.³⁵ The H1N1 epidemic, for instance, led to higher hospitalization rates among racial/ethnic minorities relative to white populations,^36,37 and a disproportionately high death rate among Hispanic children.³⁷ Clear evidence is already mounting that Black and Hispanic are bearing the heaviest burden of severe COVID-19 disease and death as well.^38,39 Yet Black and Hispanic Americans — and those with low-incomes more generally — are less likely to be insured,¹⁶ and have fewer household resources on average to cover the cost of copays and deductibles. At the same time, the Trump administration’s harsh anti-immigrant policies — including a recent rule change that deems immigrants to be “public charges” if they use public health programs, and hence potentially ineligible for upgrades in their immigration status — have sown fear in immigrant communities. These policies deter enrollment in health programs and could dissuade millions of immigrants from seeking care, including for COVID-19,⁴⁰ despite the existence of an exemption for the care and treatment of communicable diseases.⁴¹ A 2018 survey, for instance, found that 13.7% of adults in immigrant families are avoiding participation in government benefit programs because they fear the consequences for their immigration status.⁴²

Overall, the confluence of xenophobic policies, rising uninsurance, mass unemployment, and a major epidemic seems destined to exacerbate existing deep inequalities in health and healthcare.

3. COVID-19 and the Seriously Ill: Hospital Infrastructure and Affordability

The fragmented and privatized US healthcare financing system also has distinct implications for those who develop severe illness from COVID-19. While the US is unique among high-income nations in its lack of universal coverage, it is less of an outlier with respect to its healthcare infrastructure. Figure 3 displays hospital and ICU bed supply in 8 nations in North America and Europe. On the one hand, the US is towards the lower end of peer nations with respect to bed supply. It has similar beds per capita as four of the nations in this sample (the United Kingdom, Canada, the Netherlands, and Spain), but substantially less than three (France, Belgium, and Germany). On the other hand, the US has a relatively generous supply of ICUs, with more ICU beds per capita than every nation in the sample except Germany. US ICU density — about 25 beds per 100,000 population depending on how it is counted — is more than twice that of France and Canada, and many-fold higher than the United Kingdom’s.^43-47 Patients in US ICUs have, historically, been on average less severely ill than those in other nations as a consequence of this more generous supply,^44,45 suggesting more surge capacity.⁴⁸

Such aggregate statistics, however, obscure three potential problems. First, a large epidemic (with a rapid peak) could overwhelm (or severely strain) the hospital and ICU infrastructure of any nation⁴⁹ — as in Italy⁵⁰, New York, and potentially other US cities in coming weeks. Second, while the US’ laissez-faire approach to financing healthcare infrastructure has led to marked growth in ICU infrastructure^51.52, it has also led to arbitrary regional imbalances in supply. There is a six-fold difference in ICU beds per capita between the hospital referral region with the highest and the lowest bed density in the US.⁴³ As Carr, Addyson, and Kahn note, geographic variation in ICU density in the US means that a pandemic “could quickly exceed critical care capacity in some areas while leaving resources idle in others,” a reality that “reflects the limitations of a private health system in which planning occurs primarily from the hospital perspective.”⁴³ This distributive problem reflects larger imbalances in the availability of healthcare infrastructure that stem from a profit-driven financing system, exemplified by ongoing hospital expansion in healthcare-dense areas, and the simultaneous closure of hospitals in rural and poorer areas. Consequently, while supply may be ample in some areas, it is inadequate in others in the face of an epidemic. Moreover, there are no mechanisms to redeploy resources to where they are needed, or to shift patients to less-stressed areas.

A lack of health planning, in other words, has left the nation’s healthcare system ill-prepared for an emergency, whether with respect to the distribution of infrastructure, or the stockpiling of ventilators or personal protective equipment for healthcare workers. And with no unified governance, federal, state, and local governments continue to compete with hospitals for supplies.

4. Potential policy solutions

The challenge posed by COVID-19 in the context of these deficiencies in healthcare financing has prompted a range of reform proposals. The Table summarizes achieved and proposed reforms, as well as their benefits and limitations.

The Families First Coronavirus Response Act, signed into law by President Trump in March, provides coverage for the costs of diagnostic testing and related healthcare visits for the uninsured, as earlier noted.⁵³ While this may encourage testing for such individuals, the law didn’t address the problem of high treatment costs (for instance, for those admitted to the hospital for COVID-19 pneumonia). The Act also required that all public and private insurers cover testing and related visits without cost-sharing,⁵³ but, like the coverage of testing for the uninsured, does nothing to lower the far-higher out-of-pocket costs for treatment of COVID-19. Moreover, it’s unlikely to allay immigrants’ fears about enrolling in public health programs or seeking care.

Another initiative to cover the uninsured would allow uninsured individuals to purchase private plans outside of the typical “open enrollment” period, a step taken thus far by several states,⁵⁴ although not yet by the federal government. Such a move might modestly increase insurance uptake, although coverage would remain unaffordable for many, including the millions of Americans rapidly joining the ranks of the uninsured.

A plan announced April 3 by the Trump administration would allocate a portion of the $100 billion in hospital relief provided by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, passed in late March, to cover costs of COVID-19 treatment for the uninsured.⁵⁵ However, this program offers incomplete protection to patients: coverage is contingent both on the availability of funds and the participation of providers.⁵⁶

Other provisions have been aimed at reducing medical costs for those with insurance. An announcement from the Internal Revenue Service that some plans with high-deductibles will be permitted (but not required) to exempt COVID-19-related care from the plan deductible⁵⁷ might reduce out-of-pocket costs for some, but will likely have a limited effect. Additionally, some, but not all insurers, have announced plans to eliminate cost-sharing for COVID-19 related treatment, but many individuals will remain exposed to such costs absent federal action. Moreover, neither of these reforms does anything to address the problem of medical costs for other conditions, which will be increasingly unaffordable as workers lose jobs, income, and insurance benefits as recession deepens.

Addressing the lack of paid sick leave is also a policy priority. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act requires employers to provide workers with about 10 days of emergency sick leave, but it exempts the largest employers from the requirement, allows small employers to apply for exemptions, applies only to COVID-19 affected individuals, and expires at the end of 2020.^58,59 Due to the exemptions, it might cover as few as 20% of American workers.^58,59

A variety of other health financing reforms have been achieved or proposed to deal with the COVID-19 crisis. In early March, for instance, President Trump signed into law an $8.3 billion bill that increases funding for state and local health departments, vaccine and treatment development, medical supply purchases, and community health centers (CHC), clinics that provide care for substantial numbers of uninsured individuals.⁶⁰ While the additional research and development funds will be useful — and might speed the development of useful therapeutics — the law did little to guarantee the affordability of treatments that emerge from the publicly-funded research.⁶⁰ The new law also allows Medicare to pay providers for “telehealth” services, enabling remote electronic health visits from doctors that might unburden emergency rooms and reduce the risk of nosocomial coronavirus transmission. (Private insurers are also expanding coverage for telehealth services).⁶¹ But the effects of this provision are likely to be modest, particularly for poor patients, many of whom lack adequate internet access.⁶² Moreover, telehealth does little to allay patients’ cost concerns. Indeed, as phone conversation with physicians are increasingly re-classified as telehealth visits, some patients are finding that they face copays or deductibles for what may have been a previously free telephone call.⁶³

Meanwhile, mounting job losses instigated by the epidemic and the ongoing public health measures taken to control it look likely to lead to enormous losses in health coverage: an estimated 7.3 million workers could become uninsured by June 1 if predicted unemployment increases come to fruition.⁶⁴ In response, lawmakers have proposed additional reforms to expand coverage to this population. A bill introduced by House Democrats in April 2020, for instance, would provide full subsidization of COBRA plans, which would allow many individuals to maintain their employer-sponsored health benefits after job loss. Such a reform, however, would exclude many of the uninsured, while doing nothing to protect out-of-work individuals form the high copays and deductibles imposed by many employer-sponsored private plans.

Others have proposed using the Medicare program to expand coverage during the crisis. In April, Representative Pramila Jayapal and Senator Bernie Sanders introduced the Health Care Emergency Guarantee Act, which would expand Medicare coverage to all the uninsured, and simultaneously provide wrap-around coverage of copays and deductibles for the insured. Later that month, Jayapal joined Massachusetts Representative Joseph Kennedy in introducing the Medicare Crisis program, a more limited bill that would provide Medicare coverage to the unemployed, bolster state Medicaid programs, and cover all COVID-19 related care costs. Both proposals, particularly the more comprehensive Health Care Emergency Guarantee Act, would realize major expansions of coverage, protecting millions of Americans from burdensome healthcare costs for the duration of the crisis.

While many of these proposals, especially the emergency Medicare expansions, could provide some aid to those affected by COVID-19, full protection, in the long-term, would require would systemic reform. Addressing financing dysfunctions on a disease-by-disease basis, after all, is neither efficient nor fair. The COVID-19 outbreak hence serves as a reminder of the benefits of a unified, national health program. A Medicare for All reform, much discussed in Democratic presidential primary debates, would achieve universal coverage and address the problem of underinsurance. Such a reform might have additional advantages specific to an outbreak of an infectious disease. For instance, it could provide public health authorities with novel tools to combat epidemics, such as Taiwan’s use of its national health insurance database for case finding early in the epidemic.¹⁰ A well-structured national health insurance reform would also facilitate moving to a more rational and equitable allocation of ICUs and other healthcare resources⁶⁵ through health planning and the public-financing of hospital capital expansion. This could help ensure an adequate supply and distribution of resources in the face of future epidemics. At the same time, the nation needs to dramatically increase funding of its public health agencies. A doubling of funding — from around 2.5% of national health expenditures to 5.0% — will not end the current epidemic, but it could help ensure readiness for the next one.⁶⁶

“Epidemics,” wrote the German pathologist Rudolf Virchow, “are like large sign-posts from which statesman of stature can read that a disturbance has occurred in the development of his [sic] nation.”⁶⁷ (pp. 22) COVID-19 is such a sign-post. The outbreak has already exposed the multifold inadequacies of the US’ uniquely unequal, privatized and fragmented health financing system. It also illuminates other inequities — including exclusionary policies that deter immigrants from using social assistance programs, lack of universal paid sick leave, and inadequate protections for workers — that weaken our social fabric and endanger the public’s health. As of this writing, it is unclear how severe the COVID-19 outbreak will ultimately prove to be in the US, although the rapidly climbing death toll is already a tragedy. Whatever the future holds, however, the transformation of the nation’s healthcare system and social safety-net is urgently needed.

---

Table: Legislation, policies, and proposals to address health financing challenges related to COVID-19

Click HERE to view a high-res PDF of this table.

---

Figure 1: Public Health Spending as a Percent of National Health Expenditures: 2009 – 2018

Source of data: National Health Expenditures Accounts, 2009-2018.⁵

---

Figure 2: Inadequately insured non-elderly adults by state (%)

Source: Author’s analysis of the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Inadequately insured include those who are uninsured, or those who are insured but failed to see a doctor when needed due to cost. Includes adults 18 – 64 years in age. Map created with Microsoft Excel. Inadequate insurance rate for states not shown: Hawaii – 14%; New Hampshire – 18%; Massachusetts — 16%; Connecticut – 17%; Rhode Island – 19%; New Jersey – 22%; Delaware – 22%; Maryland – 19%; District of Columbia – 13%.

---

Figure 3: Hospital and ICU Bed Supply in 8 Nations

Notes: Hospital beds / 10,000 population are from OECD⁷⁴ (2016 for the US and 2017 for other nations). ICU beds for the United States is drawn from Wallace et al.⁴⁷, who reported 77,809 beds in 2009; total population denominator for that year (306,771,529) is drawn from the US Census. ICU beds for Canada is for 2009-10 and is drawn from Fowler et al.; these beds only include those with capacity for mechanical ventilation.⁴⁶ ICU beds for European nations are drawn from Rhodes et al., and reflect years 2010-11; they include “intermediate care beds” and hence may overstate capacity relative to the US and Canada.⁷⁵ Of note, the ICU bed supply in these 8 nations were also studied by Wunsch et al., who found roughly similar figures for most nations in 2005 (albeit with a substantial increase over time in the UK);⁴⁴ we selected these same nations for presentation here for consistency.

---

References

1. Coronavirus COVID-19 Global Cases by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Accessed April 5, 2020.
2. Legido-Quigley H, Asgari N, Teo YY, et al. Are high-performing health systems resilient against the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet. March 2020. https://www.thelancet.com… Accessed March 7, 2020.
3. Anderson R, Heestereek H, Klinkenberg D, Hollingsworth TD. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet. 2020.
4. Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S. Public Health’s Falling Share of US Health Spending. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(1):56-57. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302908
5. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. National Health Expenditures by type of service and source of funds, CY 1960-2018. https://www.cms.gov… Accessed April 2, 2020.
6. The Impact of Chronic Underfunding of America’s Public Health System: Trends, Risks, and Recommendations, 2019. tfah. https://www.tfah.org… Accessed April 2, 2020.
7. Leider JP, Coronado F, Beck AJ, Harper E. Reconciling Supply and Demand for State and Local Public Health Staff in an Era of Retiring Baby Boomers. Am J Prev Med. 2018;54(3):334-340. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.026
8. Sun L. Nearly 700 vacancies at CDC because of Trump administration’s hiring freeze. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com… Accessed April 2, 2020.
9. Cameron B. President Trump closed the White House pandemic office. I ran it. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com… Published March 13, 2020. Accessed April 2, 2020.
10. Wang CJ, Ng CY, Brook RH. Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics, New Technology, and Proactive Testing. JAMA. March 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.3151
11. Fraser C, Riley S, Anderson RM, Ferguson NM. Factors that make an infectious disease outbreak controllable. PNAS. 2004;101(16):6146-6151. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307506101
12. Hellewell J, Abbott S, Gimma A, et al. Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts. The Lancet Global Health. 2020;0(0). doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30074-7
13. Wilder-Smith A, Chiew CJ, Lee VJ. Can we contain the COVID-19 outbreak with the same measures as for SARS? The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020;0(0). doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30129-8
14. Dolan J, Mejia B. L.A. County gives up on containing coronavirus, tells doctors to skip testing of some patients. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com… Published 2020. Accessed March 22, 2020.
15. Parodi SM, Liu VX. From Containment to Mitigation of COVID-19 in the US. JAMA. March 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.3882
16. Cohen RA, Terlizzi EP, Martinez ME. Health Insurance Coverage: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, 2018. National center for health statistics; 2019. https://www.cdc.gov… Accessed August 20, 2019.
17. Collins SR, Bhupal HK, Doty MM. Health Insurance Coverage Eight Years After the ACA: Fewer Uninsured Americans and Shorter Coverage Gaps, But More Underinsured. Commonwealth Fund; 2019. https://www.commonwealthfund.org… Accessed November 25, 2019.
18. Kliff S. Kept at the Hospital on Coronavirus Fears, Now Facing Large Medical Bills. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com… Published March 2, 2020. Accessed March 5, 2020.
19. Conarck B. A Miami man who flew to China worried he might have coronavirus. He may owe thousands. Miami Herald. https://www.miamiherald.com… Published February 24, 2020. Accessed March 5, 2020.
20. Abrams A. Total Cost of Her COVID-19 Treatment: $34,927.43. Time. https://time.com… Accessed March 22, 2020.
21. Rosenthal E, Huetteman E. He Got Tested for Coronavirus. Then Came the Flood of Medical Bills. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com… Published March 30, 2020. Accessed March 31, 2020.
22. Inc G. In U.S., 14% With Likely COVID-19 to Avoid Care Due to Cost. Gallup.com. https://news.gallup.com… Published April 28, 2020. Accessed April 28, 2020.
23. Employee Benefits in the United States – March 2019. Bureau of Labor Statistics https://www.bls.gov… Accessed March 9, 2020.
24. Wharam JF, Zhang F, Landon BE, Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D. Low-socioeconomic-status enrollees in high-deductible plans reduced high-severity emergency care. Health Affairs. 2013;32(8):1398-1406. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1426
25. Smolderen KG, Spertus JA, Nallamothu BK, et al. Health care insurance, financial concerns in accessing care, and delays to hospital presentation in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2010;303(14):1392-1400. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.409
26. Venkatesh AK, Chou S-C, Li S-X, et al. Association Between Insurance Status and Access to Hospital Care in Emergency Department Disposition. JAMA Intern Med. April 2019. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0037
27. Winter T. “Cardiac calls” to 911 in New York City surge, and they may really be more COVID cases. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com… Accessed April 29, 2020.
28. Zafar SY, Peppercorn JM, Schrag D, et al. The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: a pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient’s experience. The oncologist. 2013;18(4):381-390. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0279
29. Potential costs of coronavirus treatment for people with employer coverage. Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker. https://www.healthsystemtracker.org… Accessed March 22, 2020.
30. Damico A, 2020. How Much Could Medicare Beneficiaries Pay For a Hospital Stay Related to COVID-19? The Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation. March 2020. https://www.kff.org… Accessed April 2, 2020.
31. Khandelwal N, White L, Curtis JR, Coe NB. Health Insurance and Out-of-Pocket Costs in the Last Year of Life Among Decedents Utilizing the ICU. Critical Care Medicine. 2019;47(6):749. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003723
32. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2018.; 2019:64. https://www.federalreserve.gov… Accessed March 4, 2020.
33. Lucas JH Elizabeth. ‘UVA Has Ruined Us’: Health System Sues Thousands Of Patients, Seizing Paychecks And Claiming Homes. Kaiser Health News. September 2019. https://khn.org… Accessed November 22, 2019.
34. Himmelstein DU, Lawless RM, Thorne D, Foohey P, Woolhandler S. Medical Bankruptcy: Still Common Despite the Affordable Care Act. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(3):431-433. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304901
35. DeBruin D, Liaschenko J, Marshall MF. Social justice in pandemic preparedness. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(4):586-591. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300483
36. Information on 2009 H1N1 Impact by Race and Ethnicity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010. https://www.cdc.gov… Accessed March 3, 2020.
37. Dee DL, Bensyl DM, Gindler J, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in hospitalizations and deaths associated with 2009 pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) virus infections in the United States. Ann Epidemiol. 2011;21(8):623-630. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.03.002
38. Radio BF Nashville Public. Long-Standing Racial And Income Disparities Seen Creeping Into COVID-19 Care. Kaiser Health News. April 2020. https://khn.org… Accessed April 6, 2020.
39. Garg S. Hospitalization Rates and Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized with Laboratory-Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 — COVID-NET, 14 States, March 1–30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e3
40. Zallman L, Finnegan KE, Himmelstein DU, Touw S, Woolhandler S. Implications of Changing Public Charge Immigration Rules for Children Who Need Medical Care. JAMA Pediatr. July 2019:e191744-e191744. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1744
41. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Public Charge. USCIS. https://www.uscis.gov… Published March 13, 2020. Accessed March 15, 2020.
42. Bernstein H, Gonzalez D, Karpman M, Zuckerman S. One in Seven Adults in Immigrant Families Reported Avoiding Public Benefit Programs in 2018. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org… Published May 20, 2019. Accessed August 13, 2019.
43. Variation in Critical Care Beds Per Capita in the United States: Implications for Pandemic and Disaster Planning. JAMA. 2010;303(14):1371-1372. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.394
44. Wunsch H, Angus DC, Harrison DA, et al. Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(10):2787-2793, e1-9. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186aec8
45. Wunsch H, Angus DC, Harrison DA, Linde-Zwirble WT, Rowan KM. Comparison of Medical Admissions to Intensive Care Units in the United States and United Kingdom. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2011;183(12):1666-1673. doi:10.1164/rccm.201012-1961OC
46. Fowler RA, Abdelmalik P, Wood G, et al. Critical care capacity in Canada: results of a national cross-sectional study. Crit Care. 2015;19:133. doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0852-6
47. Wallace DJ, Angus DC, Seymour CW, Barnato AE, Kahn JM. Critical Care Bed Growth in the United States. A Comparison of Regional and National Trends. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;191(4):410-416. doi:10.1164/rccm.201409-1746OC
48. Wunsch H, Wagner J, Herlim M, Chong DH, Kramer AA, Halpern SD. ICU occupancy and mechanical ventilator use in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(12):2712-2719. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318298a139
49. Toner E, Waldhorn R. What Hospitals Should Do to Prepare for an Influenza Pandemic. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science. 2006;4(4):397-402. doi:10.1089/bsp.2006.4.397
50. Remuzzi A, Remuzzi G. COVID-19 and Italy: what next? The Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30627-9
51. Halpern NA, Pastores SM. Critical care medicine in the United States 2000-2005: an analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs. Critical care medicine. 2010;38(1):65-71. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b090d0
52. Halpern NA, Pastores SM, Greenstein RJ. Critical care medicine in the United States 1985-2000: an analysis of bed numbers, use, and costs. Critical care medicine. 2004;32(6):1254-1259.
53. Adler MF Christen Linke Young, and Loren. What are the health coverage provisions in the House coronavirus bill? Brookings. March 2020. https://www.brookings.edu… Accessed March 15, 2020.
54. McIntire ME, Clason L. States reopen insurance enrollment as coronavirus spreads. Roll Call. https://www.rollcall.com… Accessed March 15, 2020.
55. Stephanie A. Trump Administration to Pay Hospitals to Treat Uninsured Coronavirus Patients; Hospitals would have to agree not to bill patients or issue unexpected charges – ProQuest. Wall Street Journal. https://search-proquest-com… Published April 3, 2010. Accessed April 5, 2020.
56. Update on COVID-19 Funding for Hospitals and Other Providers. The Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation. April 2020. https://www.kff.org… Accessed April 28, 2020.
57. IRS: High-deductible health plans can cover Coronavirus costs. Internal Revenue Service. https://www.irs.gov… Accessed March 11, 2020.
58. Board TE. Opinion. There’s a Giant Hole in Pelosi’s Coronavirus Bill. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com… Published March 14, 2020. Accessed March 15, 2020.
59. Lowey NM. Text – H.R.6201 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Families First Coronavirus Response Act. https://www.congress.gov… Published March 14, 2020. Accessed March 15, 2020.
60. 6 things to know about the coronavirus funding package. POLITICO. https://www.politico.com… Accessed March 9, 2020.
61. Cohen JK. New telemedicine strategies help hospitals address COVID-19. Modern Healthcare. https://www.modernhealthcare.com… Published March 6, 2020. Accessed March 10, 2020.
62. Drake C, Zhang Y, Chaiyachati KH, Polsky D. The Limitations of Poor Broadband Internet Access for Telemedicine Use in Rural America: An Observational Study. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(5):382. doi:10.7326/M19-0283
63. Hancock J. Telehealth Will Be Free, No Copays, They Said. But Angry Patients Are Getting Billed. Kaiser Health News. April 2020. https://khn.org… Accessed April 28, 2020.
64. Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. Intersecting U.S. Epidemics: COVID-19 and Lack of Health Insurance. Ann Intern Med. April 2020. doi:10.7326/M20-1491
65. Gaffney A, Waitzkin H. Policy, Politics, and the Intensive Care Unit. In: Civetta, Taylor & Kirby’s Critical Care. Fifth.; :11.
66. Gaffney A, Physicians for a National Health Program. Eight Needed Steps in the Fight Against COVID-19. Boston Review. http://bostonreview.net… Published April 2, 2020. Accessed April 6, 2020.
67. Virchow R. Collected Essays on Public Health and Epidemiology. Vol 1. (Rather LJ, ed.). Canton, MA: Science History Publications, U.S.A.; 1985.
68. Dawson L, Long M, Mar 23 KPP, 2020. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act: Summary of Key Provisions. The Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation. March 2020. https://www.kff.org… Accessed April 2, 2020.
69. H.R. 6201, Families First Coronavirus Response Act: Title-By-Title Summary. https://appropriations.house.gov…
70. Simmons-Duffin S. Some Insurers Waive Patients’ Share Of Costs For COVID-19 Treatment. NPR.org. https://www.npr.org… Accessed April 28, 2020.
71. The Worker Health Coverage Protection Act. Committee on Education & Labor Summary. https://edlabor.house.gov… Accessed April 28, 2020.
72. Himmelstein DU, Campbell T, Woolhandler S. Health Care Administrative Costs in the United States and Canada, 2017. Ann Intern Med. January 2020. doi:10.7326/M19-2818
73. Crowley R, Daniel H, Cooney TG, Engel LS, for the Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians. Envisioning a Better U.S. Health Care System for All: Coverage and Cost of Care. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(2_Supplement):S7. doi:10.7326/M19-2415
74. OECD Statistics: Health Care Resources. https://stats.oecd.org… Accessed March 7, 2020.
75. Rhodes A, Ferdinande P, Flaatten H, Guidet B, Metnitz PG, Moreno RP. The variability of critical care bed numbers in Europe. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(10):1647-1653. doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8

Text explaining storytelling and linking to toolkit

Dr. Susan Rogers

Dr. George Bohmfalk

Dr. Kathleen Healey

We physicians understand the challenges and frustrations of trying to obtain the best care for our patients given the restrictions of health insurance companies, and the costs that are passed on to them, both foreseen and unforeseen.

Just as the COVID-19 pandemic has grown uncontrollably, so have these financial burdens on our patients. From individual problems we have surged to a large scale national crisis. Families across the country are threatened with job loss, insurance loss, income loss, and the prospect of large medical bills despite insurance.

Unfortunately, I cannot relieve this anxiety or reassure my patients and their families. I look at Canada and other allies with universal coverage and know that it doesn’t have to be this way. Our people deserve much more, whether they are working or between jobs.

No one should lose health care during a pandemic–or any other time. It is time for single payer/Medicare for all in America.

As millions of American workers lose their jobs (and their employer-sponsored health benefits) during the COVID-19 pandemic, the demand is growing for Congress to guarantee health coverage for everybody in the U.S.

Two distinct visions of an emergency response have emerged, one that builds on the proven success of existing public programs like Medicare and one that subsidizes the commercial health insurance industry and large corporations that self insure by paying for outrageously expensive (and generally insufficient) COBRA policies. These approaches are reflected in a number of bills currently before Congress:

• The Health Care Emergency Guarantee Act, H.R. 6906, would empower Medicare to cover all medically necessary care during the pandemic. (Bill summary HERE; bill summary, text, and co-sponsors HERE.)
• The Medicare Crisis Program, H.R. 6674, would cover many of the newly uninsured under Medicare. (Bill summary, text, and co-sponsors HERE.)
• The Worker Health Coverage Protection Act, H.R. 6514, would subsidize COBRA for some of the uninsured. (Bill summary, text, and co-sponsors HERE.)

Comparison chart

(Note: Subsequent to the above bills being introduced in Congress, Sens. Bernie Sanders, Ed Markey, and Kirsten Gillibrand introduced the “Make Billionaires Pay Act,” which would impose a 60% tax on billionaires’ wealth gains made during the pandemic. This would generate over $420 billion in revenue, which would allow Medicare to cover out-of-pocket health care expenses for every American for one year.)

Contact your members of Congress

PNHP welcomes both the Health Care Emergency Act and the Medicare Crisis Program as emergency measures that would save lives during the immediate COVID-19 crisis. But Congress also needs to pass and implement a single-payer national health program to cover all Americans, prioritize public health spending, and allow for a coordinated response to future pandemics.

Please contact your representative and both of your senators by calling (202) 224-3121 TODAY. Ask them to support the more comprehensive Health Care Emergency Guarantee Act, as well as the Medicare for All Act of 2019 (H.R. 1384 in the House and S. 1129 in the Senate).

Looking for guidance on what to say to your elected officials? PNHP has developed phone and email scripts related to the Health Care Emergency Guarantee Act. You can also email your representative and senators directly using our simple webform (click below).

Email your legislators today!

COBRA subsidies are not the answer

Unfortunately, powerful interests are lining up behind COBRA subsidies as a means of covering the newly uninsured. But this policy would be both outrageously expensive and woefully incomplete. It would not cover workers who did not have access to employer-based plans before losing their jobs, nor would it cover the approximately 30 million Americans who lacked health insurance prior to the pandemic.

Webinar and slide set

Interested in presenting a comprehensive overview of emergency health coverage legislation to your local PNHP chapter or community group? Consider a webinar using this slide set, which was developed by PNHP-MO chair Dr. Ed Weisbart. Or share the video below, which was recorded by Ian O’Connor, a medical student in South Carolina and a member of Students for a National Health Program.

Webinar: Emergency response in the pandemic

Public Citizen hosted a webinar on April 29, 2020 to discuss legislative and other responses to the loss of employer-sponsored health coverage. Public health expert (and PNHP member) Karen Palmer offered her perspective from Canada. Other guests included Rep. Joe Kennedy and Stephanie Kang, health policy advisor to Rep. Pramila Jayapal.

Media coverage

The need for universal health care has never been more obvious
By Pamella Gronemeyer, M.D.
St. Louis Post-Dispatch, May 14, 2020
The pandemic has wrought pain and death on our neighbors, friends and coworkers and has hurt the economic well-being of Americans. In addition, it has demonstrated the frailty and inadequacy of our current patchwork health care system. Continue reading…

Rising to the moment COVID demands: How to insure all Americans in pandemic times
By Isabel Ostrer and Chris Cai
KevinMD.com, April 30, 2020
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented upheaval of the U.S. health care system. For decades the United States has stood out among peer nations as the only country with no universal health care system. Continue reading…

Here’s How to Cover Uninsured Americans During the Pandemic
By Sen. Bernie Sanders
POLITICO, April 28, 2020
As the coronavirus continues to spread, and the United States climbs closer to 1 million cases and nearly 60,000 deaths, we face an unprecedented economic and health care crisis that demands an unprecedented response. Continue reading…

As the COVID-19 pandemic wreaks physical and financial havoc across the United States, PNHP members have been writing op-eds and letters to the editor demanding long overdue single-payer reform. Members have also been appearing on television programs, radio shows, online video segments, and podcasts.

Interested in developing your own letter or op-ed? See our detailed suggestions on writing and submitting, or contact PNHP communications specialist Clare Fauke at clare@pnhp.org.

Television and radio segments

Coronavirus and Health Inequities
Interview with former APHA president Dr. Linda Rae Murray
JAMA Live, June 19, 2020

“We’re going to be dealing with Coronavirus for a while”
Interview with PNHP-MO chair Dr. Ed Weisbart
KTRS Radio, June 10, 2020

Millions of out-of-work Americans lose their health insurance
Featuring PNHP president Dr. Adam Gaffney and Dr. Victoria Dooley
CBC News, The National, May 15, 2020

How America’s Health Workers Lack Adequate Health Care
Interview with PNHP co-founder Dr. Steffie Woolhandler
Rising Up With Sonali, April 29, 2020

Coronavirus: One thing that makes job loss in U.S. so painful
Featuring PNHP co-founder Dr. Steffie Woolhandler
BBC News, April 28, 2020

13 Million will be added to the list of uninsured by June
Interview with PNHP co-founder Dr. Steffie Woolhandler
WORT Community Radio (Madison, Wisc.), April 15, 2020

Coronavirus Triggered Unemployment Leads to Massive Loss of Health Insurance Coverage
Interview with PNHP co-founder Dr. Steffie Woolhandler
Between the Lines, April 15, 2020

The Folly of Employer-based Health Insurance with 47 Million Unemployed
Interview with PNHP co-founder Dr. Steffie Woolhandler
Background Briefing with Ian Masters, April 9, 2020

The impact of Coronavirus on public health, and the need for Medicare for All
Interview with PNHP-MO chair Dr. Ed Weisbart
KTRS Radio, April 7, 2020

Meet This Moment With Medicare For All
Interview with PNHP national board member Dr. Paul Song and Business for Medicare for All president Wendell Potter
The Robust Opposition, April 6, 2020

Coronavirus could hit low-income, minority communities harder due to health care disparities
Interview with PNHP national coordinator Dr. Claudia Fegan and PNHP president-elect Dr. Susan Rogers
WGN News, April 1, 2020

‘Everyone is afraid’ as Illinois virus cases spike
Interview with PNHP national coordinator Dr. Claudia Fegan
PBS NewsHour, March 30, 2020

Behind the News Podcast: COVID-19
Featuring PNHP co-founder Dr. David Himmelstein (at 7:20)
Jacobin Radio, March 25, 2020

The Issue Is: Coronavirus
Interview with PNHP national board member Dr. Paul Song
The Issue Is, March 21, 2020

Biden Is Wrong—Single-Payer Healthcare Does Help Fight Pandemics
Interview with Dr. James Kahn
The Real News Network, March 19, 2020

Roundtable: Coronavirus Shows the Need for Medicare for All
Featuring PNHP co-founder Dr. Steffie Woolhandler
Democracy Now, March 5, 2020

Coronavirus Spread and the Urgent Need for Medicare for All
Interview with PNHP national board member Dr. Paul Song
Rising Up With Sonali, February 26

News and opinion pieces

U.S. health insurers doubled profits in second quarter amid pandemic
Quotes PNHP co-founder Dr. Steffie Woolhandler
The Guardian, August 14, 2020
The enormous medical response in America to the coronavirus pandemic has not put a drain on US health insurers, which doubled profits in the second quarter of 2020 compared with the same time last year. Continue reading…

US doctor in Canada: Medicare for All would have made America’s COVID response much better
By Dr. Khati Hendry
USA Today, August 5, 2020
I’m a family physician who moved to Canada from California 14 years ago, largely because of Canadian Medicare, the country’s national health insurance program. I’ve been much happier practicing medicine where my patients have universal coverage. Continue reading…

More people called out sick in April than at any time on record. Was it COVID-19?
Quotes PNHP president Dr. Adam Gaffney
McClatchy News Service, July 28, 2020
When the novel coronavirus planted its feet firmly in American soil around March, the amount of people calling out sick from work grew to the highest number since at least 1976, according to new research, suggesting the number of COVID-19 cases is far greater than reported. Continue reading…

Record-Breaking Number of Americans Called Out Sick From Work in April, Study Finds
Quotes PNHP president Dr. Adam Gaffney
Gizmodo, July 27, 2020
New research out Monday may provide more insight into how many Americans were sickened by covid-19 during the earliest days of the pandemic, when access to testing was extremely limited. Continue reading…

Pandemic reveals big need for universal health care
By Erica Heiman, M.D.; Jack Bernard; and Henry Kahn, M.D.
The (Jacksonville) Florida Times-Union, July 14, 2020
COVID-19 has stolen the lives of over 130,000 Americans so far with many more to come. We think that universal health insurance coverage — such as expanded, improved Medicare for All — would have lessened the pandemic’s impact on our nation. Continue reading…

Our Health Care Is ‘Market Chaos’
Interview with PNHP president Dr. Adam Gaffney
Democracy, Voices of the Virus, June 26, 2020
There’s no question that the epidemic intensified the debate about health-care reform in this country. It clearly laid bare many of the dysfunctions and the injustices of the U.S. way of paying for health care. Continue reading…

Pandemic response shows glaring health care finance inequities
By PNHP board adviser Dr. Robert Stone
The (Fort Wayne, Ind.) Journal Gazette, June 25, 2020
Follow the money. The coronavirus spread like wildfire across the United States. New York City hospitals were quickly overwhelmed with sick and dying patients. Everywhere, hospitals scrambled to create more ICU beds and find more ventilators. Continue reading…

Millions at high risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes lack coverage to cover costs
Quotes PNHP president Dr. Adam Gaffney
Modern Healthcare, June 10, 2020
More than 18 million people who were most at risk of experiencing severe outcomes from COVID-19 at the start of the outbreak had the least access to healthcare because they were either uninsured or underinsured. Continue reading…

18 Million Americans Lack Adequate Health Insurance While Facing Greater Risk of Severe Coronavirus, Study Finds
Quotes PNHP president Dr. Adam Gaffney and PNHP co-founder Dr. Steffie Woolhandler
Newsweek, June 10, 2020
More than 18 million Americans, most of whom are minorities and low-income individuals, are uninsured or underinsured while also being at increased risk of developing severe cases of COVID-19. Continue reading…

The other epidemic: Lack of health insurance for all Americans
By Health Care Justice—NC chair Dr. Jessica Schorr Saxe
The Charlotte Post, May 27, 2020
Rapidly and predictably following the onset of the pandemic, many Americans are victims of an epidemic of uninsurance, which will also predictably lead to suffering and death. Continue reading…

The Coronavirus Isn’t the Only American Health Epidemic
By Dr. Augie Lindmark
The Nation, May 21, 2020
Lately my work in the hospital consists of two activities. Admit patients with Covid-19, and, if lucky, discharge patients with Covid-19. Continue reading…

COVID-19 and Medicare for All
By Drs. Ashley Duhon and Sara Robicheaux
The Lens, May 21, 2020
Last week, we officially began our careers as physicians in the middle of a global pandemic and public health crisis. Continue reading…

Best of times, worst of times
By Dr. Robert S. Kiefner
Concord (N.H.) Monitor, May 16, 2020
With the opening paragraph of “The Tale of Two Cities,” Charles Dickens provided an overview of our new reality; our lives in the time of COVID-19. Continue reading…

Inmates and Staff Fearful as Coronavirus Strikes Prisons, Jails
Quotes PNHP co-founder Dr. Steffie Woolhandler
MedPage Today, April 30, 2020
Coronavirus outbreaks in prisons and jails across the country have the potential to cripple any gains made by local communities in curbing the pandemic. “They’re not some isolated spot where you can just stick people.” Continue reading…

In U.S., more than 1 in 4 healthcare workers lack paid sick leave – study
Quotes PNHP co-founders Drs. David Himmelstein and Steffie Woolhandler
Reuters, April 29, 2020
Many U.S. healthcare workers on the front lines in the COVID-19 pandemic lack basic health insurance and more than 1 in 4 have no paid sick leave, increasing the risk that they will show up for work even if they are infected with the coronavirus. Continue reading…

Coronavirus throws spotlight on American health care
By Dr. Mary Ganguli and Judith R. Lave
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, April 29, 2020
The coronavirus pandemic has spread across the world. Watching the news shows us how this health care crisis is playing out in different countries with their different political systems and health care financing systems. Continue reading…

COVID-19 crisis bring light to insurance disparities
By Columbia (Mo.) health care providers
The Missourian, April 21, 2020
Millions of Americans rely on employment-based health insurance, but problems caused by the linkage of insurance to employment are increasingly evident. Continue reading…

Early pandemic health lessons
By Dr. James G. Fieseher
SeacoastOnline.com, April 17, 2020
Much will be written about the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Here are a few I have observed at this time in the process. Continue reading…

Profit over people, cost over care: America’s broken healthcare exposed by virus
Quotes PNHP president Dr. Adam Gaffney
The Guardian, April 16, 2020
With over 30,900 people dead and more than a 639,000 infected with the coronavirus in the US the last question on a person’s mind should be how they will pay for life-saving treatment. Continue reading…

U.S. for-profit health care sector cuts thousands of jobs as pandemic rages
Quotes PNHP co-founder Dr. David Himmelstein
The Guardian, April 14, 2020
Maureen Zeman was a registered nurse for 29 years at a hospital in San Jose, California, before she was laid off with dozens of other nurses despite the coronavirus pandemic. Continue reading…

As economy sheds jobs, bring on Medicare for all the unemployed
By Dr. George Bohmfalk
The Charlotte Observer, April 13, 2020
As a result of the coronavirus pandemic, millions of U.S. workers who were satisfied with and didn’t want to give up their employer-provided health insurance are losing both their jobs and the associated insurance. Continue reading…

Employer-based insurance is a crumbling defense against a global pandemic
By Jordan Rook, Alec Feuerbach, and Jake Fox
The Colorado Sun, April 13, 2020
The losses inflicted by SARS-Cov-2, the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19, have been staggering. In the U.S., over 555,000 have fallen ill, more than 22,000 have perished, and even our most optimistic models suggest… Continue reading…

The health-care pandemic
By PNHP past president Dr. Johnathon Ross
The Toledo (Ohio) Blade, April 10, 2020
For centuries, public health experts have known that contagious, deadly diseases like measles, polio, hepatitis, HIV, tuberculosis, flu — and now coronavirus — are much more difficult and expensive to treat than to prevent. Continue reading…

“This Is A World-Changing Event”
Interview with PNHP past president Dr. Andy Coates
WAMC, The Roundtable, April 10, 2020
I guess I’m losing track of the weeks, two or three, four weeks. There has been an eerie calm with the command for social distancing. Continue reading…

In Chicago, 70% of COVID-19 Deaths Are Black
Quotes former APHA president Dr. Linda Rae Murray
WBEZ, April 5, 2020
The COVID-19 virus is killing black residents in Cook County at disproportionately high rates, according to early data analyzed by WBEZ. While black residents make up only 23% of the population in the county, they account for 58% of the COVID-19 deaths. Continue reading…

How a pandemic makes the most compelling case for ‘Medicare for All’
Quotes Drs. Marcia Angell and Donald Moore
Well + Good, April 3, 2020
Medicare for All has been shoved front and center as public support for universal health care surges amid the COVID-19 pandemic. In the last two weeks, millions of Americans have lost their jobs—and with them, their health insurance. Continue reading…

Hospitals Got $100 Billion in the Stimulus Package. But A Lot of That Could Go Toward Administrative Costs
Quotes PNHP co-founder Dr. Steffie Woolhandler
TIME, April 1, 2020
Hospitals have spent the past few weeks racing to respond to the growing COVID-19 crisis, supplementing shortages of equipment, calling back retired personnel, and transforming entire hospital wings to care for infected patients. Continue reading…

Universal health care would benefit state amid COVID-19
By Dr. Samuel Metz
Portland (Ore.) Tribune, April 1, 2020
Oregon’s Universal Health Care task force, charged by our Legislature to design a statewide health care insurance plan, canceled its first meeting when COVID-19 spread across the state. Continue reading…

ICU doctor: Coronavirus frightens me. It’s severe, unpredictable and it has no cure.
By PNHP national board member Dr. Phil Verhoef
USA Today, March 26, 2020
The shift from trying to contain the illness to treating those who have been infected, one at a time, is eye opening and heart rending. What do you do when there are vastly more sick patients than you can care for? Continue reading…

US private health insurance companies clog system amid Covid-19 pandemic
Quotes former SNaHP board member Dr. Augie Lindmark
The Guardian, March 26, 2020
As Augie Lindmark, a resident physician at Yale University prepared for an onslaught of Covid-19 patients last week, he noticed something at his hospital: there were still patients without the virus, completely stable, in the beds. Continue reading…

Why are we waiting for Medicare for All?
By F. Douglas Stephenson, LCSW, BCD
The Gainesville (Fla.) Sun, March 23, 2020
An old social justice chant, “Why are We Waiting,” is sung to the tune of the beautiful and inspiring Christmas carol, “O Come All Ye Faithful.” The lyrics apply to the situation today. Continue reading…

America’s extreme neoliberal healthcare system is putting the country at risk
By PNHP president Dr. Adam Gaffney
The Guardian, March 21, 2020
At the final debate of the Democratic presidential primary on Sunday, Senator Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden clashed on the coronavirus. Sanders contended the pandemic laid bare “the incredible weakness and dysfunctionality” of the US healthcare system, and called for single-payer reform. Continue reading…

Why the U.S. failed the coronavirus test
By former New England Journal of Medicine editor-in-chief Dr. Marcia Angell
Santa Fe New Mexican, March 21, 2020
The coronavirus pandemic is the best argument for “Medicare for All.” As it stands, most Americans get health care only if we have insurance that will pay for it. If we don’t or we can’t afford the deductibles and copayments, too bad. Continue reading…

COVID-19 pandemic proves need for Medicare for all
By PNHP Cincinnati co-founder Dr. James Binder
The Cincinnati Inquirer, March 20, 2020
I am one of the 23,000 members of the Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP) who advocate for Medicare for all. Our current health crisis provides strong evidence that we indeed do need a Medicare for all system in this country. Continue reading…

Masks, Gowns, and Medicare For All
By Jonathan Michels
Piedmont Left Review, March 20, 2020
If patients want to support healthcare workers on the frontlines of the coronavirus pandemic, they should join us in calling for a universal, single-payer healthcare system. Continue reading…

Coronavirus: A strong argument for Medicare for All
By Dr. Alice Rothchild
The Seattle Times, March 18, 2020
COVID-19 has laid bare the weaknesses in our system and the urgent need for Medicare for All. We cannot nationally isolate or personally buy our way out of this outbreak. Continue reading…

Public Health Experts: Single-Payer Systems Coping With Coronavirus More Effectively Than For-Profit Model
Quotes PNHP co-founder Dr. David Himmelstein
Common Dreams, March 16, 2020
As the coronavirus pandemic places extraordinary strain on national health care systems around the world, public health experts are making the case that countries with universal single-payer systems have thus far responded more efficiently and effectively to the outbreak than nations like the United States. Continue reading…

Love in the time of coronavirus
By Dr. Dipesh Navsaria
Madison (Wisc.) State Journal, March 16, 2020
Universal health care is a form of love for others as well — not only does it speak to a societal belief that we all deserve to be healthy, but it ensures that a lack of health coverage doesn’t result in greater spread of disease due to delayed diagnosis. Continue reading…

Surprise medical bills, coronavirus and bad insurance: 3 arguments for Medicare for All
By PNHP national board member Dr. Phil Verhoef
USA Today, March 9, 2020
Working in various hospitals across the country, I have met so many patients who delay or avoid needed care for fear of surprise bills and financial catastrophe. That’s risky for them and, in the face of a threat like coronavirus, for all of us. Continue reading…

Letters to the editor

Covid-19 pandemic demands better health care coverage
By Dr. Robert Milch
The Buffalo News, August 4, 2020
While the pandemic rages, our President touts a questionable mortality rate under 2% as some perverse indicator, 136,000 deaths later, that “things are under control.” Continue reading…

Medicare for All amid a pandemic
By George Bohmfalk, M.D.
The Charlotte Observer, Letters, July 27, 2020
Until now, rationing has only been a scare tactic in criticisms of Medicare for All. Our free-market, capitalistic, for-profit health care system promised to spare us from socialist disasters like rationing. Continue reading…

What the C.D.C. Did Wrong, and Why
By Drs. Malini DeSilva, Philip Lederer, and Brian Yablon
New York Times, June 4, 2020
The C.D.C. is a leading international public health entity, its programs and projects drive health policy, and it responds to outbreaks of public health significance worldwide. Despite all of this, the agency, along with state and local health departments, has been underfunded and neglected for decades. Continue reading…

COVID-19 exposes flaws of employer-based health insurance
By Jack Bernard, former Director of Health Planning for the state of Georgia
Modern Healthcare, May 16, 2020
Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. was the worst-performing developed nation regarding health insurance coverage, with 45% underinsured or uninsured despite the Affordable Care Act. Continue reading…

The coronavirus highlights Obamacare’s glaring shortcomings
By Dr. Jay D. Brock
Washington Post, May 12, 2020
Defending the ACA is ultimately an exercise in futility because the ACA will not fix the two glaring problems besetting health insurance today: lack of universal coverage and affordability. Continue reading…

Time for single-payer health care
By Sachin Jindal
The (Toledo, Ohio) Blade, May 9, 2020
To prepare for a future pandemic, it is clear that the United States must transition to a federally funded single-payer health-care system. Continue reading…

Crisis highlights need for universal health care
By Dr. Robert Blake
St. Louis Post-Dispatch, May 3, 2020
Millions of Americans depend on employment-based health insurance, but problems caused by the linkage of insurance to employment are increasingly evident. Continue reading…

COVID-19’s impact on health insurance
By Dr. Kathleen Healey
Napa Valley (Calif.) Register, April 28 2020
Millions in our nation have just lost their jobs and their family’s health insurance in the middle of a COVID-19 pandemic. These families not only face the prospect of illness, but enormous medical expenses. Continue reading…

Hospital cutbacks amid coronavirus accentuate the flaws in our health care system
By former SNaHP board member Jonathan Michels
Raleigh News & Observer, April 10, 2020
The coronavirus pandemic lays bare the ways in which our expensive, inefficient and profit-driven health care system has left our communities defenseless against public health crises. Continue reading…

Protect workers, provide health coverage
By Joyce Schlag, CCW
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Letters, March 19, 2020
We are all connected, a community of people experiencing vulnerability in the face of the coronavirus which threatens us, our families, neighbors and friends. We are becoming aware of how the well being of one person can affect the well being of many. Continue reading…

Everyone must take this virus seriously
By Dr. George Bohmfalk
The Charlotte Observer, Letters, March 16, 2020
Fellow citizens, please take this seriously. Even young, healthy people can die from this. You can carry it to your elderly parents and grandparents. Stay home unless absolutely necessary. Keep your distance in public. Wash those hands, often. Use common sense for everyone’s sake. Continue reading…

Improved Medicare for All will keep us safer
By Bill Semple, board chair, Colorado Foundation for Universal Health Care
Daily Camera (Boulder, Colo.), Letters, March 13, 2020
Our current patchwork of health care coverage, with its gaps, bureaucratic obstacles, high deductibles, co-pays, surprise billings, prior authorizations, claims denials, stagnant wages and narrow networks of providers leave us vulnerable. Continue reading…

Americans need a fully funded health care program
By PNHP Western Pennsylvania co-founder Dr. Judy Albert
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Letters, March 9, 2020
The coronavirus has arrived in the U.S. and it’s only a matter of time before it reaches Western Pennsylvania. The American public copes with fear of infection by stockpiling hand sanitizer, rather than considering how this epidemic demonstrates the unavoidable connection we have with one another and with all living things on the planet. Continue reading…

Support Medicare for All
By Dr. Kathleen Healey
San Francisco Chronicle, Letters, March 9, 2020
Americans are threatened by a COVID-19 pandemic and over 27 million of us have no health insurance. What could possibly go wrong? During an outbreak of a communicable disease we are all safer if everyone around us has access to health care. Continue reading…

Quote of the day

For more recent entries (after June 30, 2020) please see the QOTD page on our website. You may also wish to subscribe to the QOTD mailing list to receive daily emails.

Americans want the option of a government-regulated and -subsidized health plan
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, June 23, 2020
Although most of the questions in this latest poll were about job loss and insurance coverage, plus some questions about public policies during the COVID pandemic, the question above stood out. Continue reading…

Hannity’s downplaying of COVID-19 threat increased deaths
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, June 22, 2020
Do television hosts have a responsibility when they disseminate misinformation that results in adverse consequences on the viewing audience? Continue reading…

V. Fuchs: We may now have the dynamic for political change in health reform
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, June 15, 2020
For decades, Victor Fuchs has been telling us, “National health insurance will probably come to the United States after a major change in the political climate — the kind of change that often accompanies a war, a depression, or large-scale civil unrest.” Continue reading…

COVID-19 crisis comes with financial toxicity
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, June 12, 2020
As Steffie Woolhandler states, “Medicare for All is the long-term answer.” Continue reading…

COVID-19 and Health Financing: Perils and Possibilities
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, June 10, 2020
Although we have the most expensive health care system in the world, the COVID-19 pandemic provides stark evidence that our health care financing system is highly dysfunctional, wasting tremendous resources while impairing health care access. Continue reading…

Hospital CEOs paid millions while many workers furloughed
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, June 8, 2020
Billions of dollars of taxpayer funds have been paid out to some of the nation’s largest and most successful hospital chains, supposedly to prevent job losses of health care workers, though tens of thousands have instead received pay cuts or have even been furloughed. Continue reading…

Challenging inequality through the ‘civil rights of health’
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, June 4, 2020
We have read much about the social determinants of health and the social and economic inequities that lead to unjust health disparities. As these authors state, “justice makes us healthy and injustice makes us ill.” Continue reading…

China’s delay, WHO’s frustration, and US’s abdication
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, June 2, 2020
President Trump has recently condemned both China and the World Health Organization for their alleged delays and mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic. Continue reading…

AMA statement on Trump severing ties with WHO
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, June 1, 2020
President Trump’s effort to sever ties with the World Health Organization during this horrendous pandemic seems like it screams out for nonviolent resistance. Continue reading…

Bailout funds go to the wealthiest hospitals
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, May 26, 2020
Compared to our highly dysfunctional, fragmented system of financing health care, heavily dependent on private health insurance, a single payer model of an improved Medicare program that covered everyone would be vastly superior. Continue reading…

COVID-19 vaccine as a ‘global public good’
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, May 21, 2020
At the virtual meeting of the World Health Organization this week, China expressed its intent to produce a much needed COVID-19 vaccine as a “global public good.” Continue reading…

Balanced budget requirements threaten Medicaid program
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, May 19, 2020
The COVID-19 pandemic combined with a major economic downturn, massive loss of employment, often with the loss of health insurance, has resulted in much greater demand for enrollment in the Medicaid program. Continue reading…

What should we do about the payer-provider disconnect?
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, May 15, 2020
The current pandemic certainly demonstrates the payer-provider disconnect in health care. The private insurers are doing spectacularly well whereas the players in the health care delivery system – many hospitals and especially physicians – are facing a financial crisis. Continue reading…

Rich hospitals get government handouts
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, May 14, 2020
Private insurers generally pay hospitals at twice the rate that Medicare pays and at an even greater multiple than what Medicaid pays. Continue reading…

Why would states deny retroactive eligibility for Medicaid?
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, May 13, 2020
In the absence of a universal health care financing program it is inevitable that many will remain uninsured because they do not qualify for whatever programs are available, or they simply cannot afford them. Continue reading…

Is it time to nationalize hospitals?
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, May 12, 2020
The combination of a health crisis plus an economic crisis that has disrupted the lives of everyone of us certainly lays fertile ground for reassessing our health care system and its financing. Continue reading…

Get sick now; Insurer fee waivers for COVID-19 treatment may expire by June 1
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, May 8, 2020
The nation’s private health insurers now have a chance to prove to us that they are worthy of controlling our health expenditures. During the worst pandemic in a century, combined with a catastrophic economic downturn, what are they offering us? Continue reading…

WFTU on business games related to the COVID-19 vaccine
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, May 7, 2020
Pretty strong statement. But, you know, we’ve been speaking for decades about the terrible deficiencies in our health care financing system. Continue reading…

Frank talk about the need for Medicare for All
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, May 5, 2020
Sometimes it just needs to be said. Continue reading…

Covid-19 and Hospital Inequality
By Richard N. Gottfried, author of the New York Health Act
Quote of the Day, May 4, 2020
This article on hospital inequality in the COVID-19 epidemic is an excellent analysis by Barbara Caress, a long-standing keen analyst of our health care system. Continue reading…

Our safety net is a sieve with large rents
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, May 1, 2020
The COVID-19 pandemic is bringing home the reality that it is imperative that our government always be at the ready to provide safety net functions in times of need, whether individual or societal. Continue reading…

‘Alliance to Fight for Health Care’ plans to defeat Medicare for All
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, April 29, 2020
One of the painful lessons of the tragic Covid-19 pandemic is that we see how terrible the functioning of our health care financing system is, as if it weren’t already obvious before the pandemic arrived. Continue reading…

U.S. will not take part in WHO global drugs, vaccine initiative launch
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, April 27, 2020
Talk about a time that we need to join together in international cooperation; we have a pandemic that has already caused over 200,000 deaths and economic disruption throughout the world. Continue reading…

Austerity and the Americanization of health care was Italy’s problem
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, April 24, 2020
Italy’s lesson? Austerity kills. Continue reading…

Pandemic brings fallacy of insurance choice into focus
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, April 21, 2020
The COVID-19 pandemic has certainly captured the attention of the media, and everyone else. How could it not, considering the dramatic adverse impact it has had on each of us? Continue reading…

What would Jonas Salk say?
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, April 20, 2020
Understandably, much is being written about the lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly on how important it would be to have had in place an efficient and effective universal health program such as single payer Medicare for All. Continue reading…

Private agent vs. social planner in COVID-19 mitigation
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, April 16, 2020
These two timely papers on the coronavirus pandemic should be of interest to single-payer supporters. Continue reading…

ACO wonks stumbling through the pandemic
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, April 15, 2020
Earlier this week the National Association of ACOs released the results of a survey indicating that “a large portion of risk-based ACOs are likely to quit over concerns about COVID-19.” Continue reading…

Financial Times on the social contract
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, April 14, 2020
It has become obvious to many of us that the government must play a greater role in establishing policies that allow us to advance a social contract that benefits everyone. Continue reading…

COVID-19: The swan song of ACOs
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, April 13, 2020
Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) were established on the theory that by making providers accountable for the health care they were providing, you could improve quality while lowering costs. Continue reading…

Malcolm Gladwell: The lesson of the COVID-19 pandemic
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, April 10, 2020
“You know who should be leading the conversation about the health of our population? The public health people. They’re the ones. They have the most important lessons to teach us.” Continue reading…

COVID-19 pandemic and the loss of health insurance
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, April 7, 2020
“National health insurance will probably come to the United States after a major change in the political climate — the kind of change that often accompanies a war, a depression, or large-scale civil unrest.” Continue reading…

Fate of commercial insurance under the COVID-19 pandemic
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, April 6, 2020
Although we already have an inequitable, fragmented, dysfunctional health care financing system, in spite of the highest per capita health care spending of all nations, the current COVID-19 pandemic crisis is revealing the severe instability in our health care financing infrastructure. Continue reading…

Another gift of COVID-19: Medical bankruptcy
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, April 1, 2020
As of 2020, our national health expenditures are $4 trillion, or $12,118 per capita. Considering that we are already spending that much, you would think that everyone could receive health care without experiencing financial hardship. Continue reading…

Saez and Zucman explain how we can protect our health and save our economy
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, March 31, 2020
Much has been written about how having an equitable, efficient, comprehensive national health program (i.e., single payer Medicare for All) would have been extremely helpful combating illnesses caused by the coronavirus pandemic. Continue reading…

You don’t need a pandemic to lose your health plan at work
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, March 27, 2020
A well designed single payer model of an improved Medicare for All would meet the health care financing needs of everyone forever while being affordable for each of us based on our ability to pay. Continue reading…

Emergency coronavirus funds for American Indians languish in bureaucratic limbo
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, March 20, 2020
The Trump administration has held up $40 million in emergency aid Congress approved earlier this month to help American Indians combat the coronavirus. Continue reading…

GOP-led states diverge on easing Medicaid access during COVID-19
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, March 19, 2020
You would think that the COVID-19 pandemic would provoke state administrators to look for ways of reducing barriers to health care. Expanding Medicaid coverage for low-income individuals would seem to be a logical step. Continue reading…

Can we put partisan politics aside during the pandemic?
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, March 18, 2020
Unfortunately, President Trump did not get off to a sterling start in his response to the coronavirus crisis. He first wanted to minimize it so as to not distract from his campaign for reelection, and then when it appeared to be a more serious problem, he seemed more concerned about its impact on the economy rather than the potentially disastrous consequences that it would have on the health of the people. Continue reading…

Pandemics and Medicare for All
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, March 17, 2020
Two issues were appropriately conflated during the Biden/Sanders debate. One is that nations must be prepared at all times to address current and future public health crises, and the other is that the United States needs to reform its health care financing infrastructure to make it work well for everyone. Continue reading…

Taiwan’s COVID-19 lesson for us
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, March 13, 2020
Taiwan has a single payer national health program. The United States does not. Both nations now face the COVID-19 pandemic. “Taiwan is an example of how a society can respond quickly to a crisis and protect the interests of its citizens. (JAMA)” Yet in the United States, “The federal response really has been a fiasco. (Jha)” Continue reading…

With Coronavirus, ‘Health Care for Some’ Is a Recipe for Disaster
Comment by Dr. Don McCanne
Quote of the Day, March 12, 2020
Why should we have “a safety net big enough, and strong enough, for everyone” only during an epidemic? Every day people face potential financial hardship, suffer from injury and illness and perhaps die prematurely. Continue reading…

The global COVID-19 pandemic has hit the United States especially hard, with the fractured and inequitable state of U.S. health care and a lack of urgency on the part of some policymakers making matters even worse. PNHP has developed an eight-point plan of steps needed to confront COVID-19, which was published April 3, 2020 in Boston Review, and is reproduced below.

Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP) Statement

COVID-19 cases have been identified in all 50 US states, a surge of hospitalizations is underway in some cities, and more than 5000 had died of the illness by early April. Meanwhile, unprecedented public health measures undertaken to slow the spread of the outbreak look certain to provoke a recession, with job losses for millions or tens of millions of workers. The nation is facing this outbreak and the looming recession with a dangerously fragmented and privatized health system. At the start of the crisis, 30 million people were uninsured¹ and 44 million more underinsured²; around one in three Americans went without needed medical care because of costs²; and medical bankruptcies were commonplace.³ These problems will worsen as the economy spirals downward and hospitalizations rise.

Since its founding in the late 1980s, Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP) has called for a single-payer, expanded and improved “Medicare for All” reform to ensure that everyone in the nation has health insurance that would: eliminate cost barriers that keep our patients from needed care; improve health outcomes; and free physicians to focus on patient care, not wasteful billing and clerical activities that sap needed time and resources.^4-6 The COVID-19 crisis intensifies the urgency of such reform. It also calls for additional measures to fully protect all of our patients, including the most disadvantaged. We present, below, recommendations for measures needed to minimize hardship and loss of life during the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath.

– Adam Gaffney, M.D., M.P.H., PNHP President

1. Immediately protect patients from medical costs due to COVID-19

Recently-passed legislation eliminated cost-sharing for COVID-19-related diagnostic testing, and provided coverage of testing for the uninsured. However, it did not expand coverage of treatment, leaving tens of millions of Americans at risk of financial disaster in the face of illness. Even those with insurance who are treated at an in-network hospital are likely to be stuck with thousands of dollars in copays and deductibles. For the uninsured (or the insured who are treated “out-of-network”), costs are likely to rise to tens, or even hundreds of thousands of dollars.^7-9

PNHP calls on Congress and the President to immediately enact legislation providing full coverage for all COVID-19-related care for everyone in the United States. Such a measure would protect patients who are infected, and ensure that those with symptoms do not delay seeking testing and care.

2. Implement universal coverage through a Medicare-for-All reform

Covering the costs of COVID-19 related care is not enough. In the impending recession, millions will lose jobs, income and health insurance, exacerbating the healthcare cost crisis. Some, including those with severe COVID-19 infections, will require costly long-term care. Medicare for All reform would guarantee coverage for everyone in the United States; eliminate cost barriers for needed care, whether for COVID-19 or other conditions; and ensure that precious healthcare dollars are spent on care — not wasteful bureaucracy¹⁰, corporate profits, or unnecessary, but lucrative interventions. Such reform is needed now more than ever.

3. Restore our public health infrastructure

Public health agencies are our first line of defense against novel epidemics. However, chronic underfunding of our federal, state, and local public health agencies impeded the response to this outbreak, exemplified by the ongoing diagnostic testing fiasco.^11,12 Funding cuts have forced state and local public health agencies to eliminate 50,000 positions, a 20% decrease in the frontline workforce for fighting epidemics.¹³ The shortfall in resources has led some local public health authorities to give up¹⁴ on the case identification and contact tracing efforts that other nations have successfully employed to control spread of the epidemic.¹⁵

PNHP calls for increased federal funding to raise the share of national health expenditures devoted to public health and prevention from 2.5% to 5.0%. Bolstering the public health infrastructure is vital to combat the current pandemic, and to address other public health needs.

4. Protect incarcerated patients

Our nation’s densely crowded jails and prisons, which house the largest incarcerated population in the world, put inmates, staff and communities at grave risk of COVID-19. Outbreaks are already being reported among this uniquely vulnerable population.¹⁶

In addition to guaranteed healthcare access for the incarcerated population, PNHP joins other groups in calling for measures to reduce the at-risk population: the release of persons in pretrial detention or incarcerated for technical violations of parole or probation; stopping arrests for low-level offenses; early release where possible, especially for persons at increased health risk due to advanced age (a group known to have a low risk of re-offending) or co-morbidities.¹⁷

Universal coverage via Medicare for All would also ensure that individuals have adequate healthcare access in their communities after release from incarceration.

5. Protect immigrant patients

The Trump administration’s public charge rule, which imposes penalties on immigrant families for enrolling in social programs like Medicaid, will lead many to avoid needed testing or treatment for COVID-19,¹⁸ even though such care is technically exempt from the rule.¹⁹ Meanwhile, immigrants and asylum seekers in Immigration, Customs, and Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities are at serious risk from a COVID-19 outbreak; such facilities are crowded and are often in remote locations with limited accessibility to medical care.²⁰

PNHP urges the federal government to rescind the public charge rule, and joins other human rights organizations in calling for ICE to release asylum seekers and immigrants held in administrative detention, and to ensure secure travel and continuity of medical care for released individuals.²⁰ Additionally, PNHP calls for a universal Medicare-for-All coverage expansion to cover all US residents regardless of immigrant status.

6. Stabilize hospital financing while protecting patients from hospital costs

In the face of the coronavirus threat, hospitals across the country have cancelled elective procedures and stockpiled supplies, leading to falling revenue and rising costs.²¹ For some hospitals, particularly smaller rural hospitals, the coronavirus crisis could lead to closure.²¹ In response, recent legislation provided almost $100 billion in relief to the nation’s hospitals.²²

Our nation can ill afford hospital closures, particularly at this moment. However, reform is also needed in how hospitals are paid to ensure their stability in the face of future crises, and to protect patients, who have faced lawsuits, wage garnishment, and home foreclosures as a result of hospital efforts to recoup medical debt.²³ Hospital associations, meanwhile, continue to spend precious resources lobbying against public insurance expansions. PNHP hence calls for action from the nation’s community hospitals, the American Hospital Association, and the federal government.

Hospitals must end all lawsuits against patients for medical bills, including those hospitalized for COVID-19. The AHA should cease spending member hospitals’ funds on lobbying efforts against Medicare-for-All and other coverage expansions. In particular the AHA should withdraw from, and stop contributing to, the Partnership for America’s Healthcare Future, a dark-money lobbying group.

Finally, PNHP calls on the federal government to take action. It should replace hospitals’ current per-patient payment system with global budget funding similar to how fire departments are paid. This would free up substantial funds that hospitals currently spend on administration, which could be redirected to patient care — including for infectious disease-related surges.²⁴ Global budgets would also ensure that hospitals are not dependent on lucrative elective procedures for their financial stability, and that hospitals caring for disproportionate numbers of poor and poorly-insured individuals have adequate resources. Finally, such a reform of hospital financing should include separate and dedicated funding for new hospital infrastructure, to ensure that an adequate and equitable supply of infrastructure — including hospital beds, ICUs, and a reserve supply of emergency equipment and protective gear — are available throughout the nation. Until then, the federal government should take direct action and provide necessary funding to procure needed personal protective equipment for the nation’s hospital workers.

7. Ensure that pharmaceuticals and vaccines — including for COVID-19 — are affordable for the public

A recent bill signed into law by President Trump provided needed funds for the development of drugs and vaccines for COVID-19. However, the new law will not ensure that patients could afford the newly-developed therapeutics.²⁵

The current crisis underlines the need for the comprehensive pharmaceutical reform policy advocated by PNHP.²⁶ We call for increased public drug R&D, including publicly-financed clinical trials. However, publicly-developed therapeutics — including for COVID-19 — should remain in the public domain, and be available to patients without charge. Additionally, prescription drug supply chains are threatened by the COVID-19 crisis, which could lead to shortages of essential medicines.²⁷ The US should establish public drug manufacturing capacity as one backup to address such shortfalls.²⁶

8. International considerations

Every nation faces major challenges fighting COVID-19. Some current US policies hinder other nations’ responses to the pandemic, and the global cooperation vital to containment. PNHP hence recommends easing or ending international sanctions that disrupt nations’ ability to respond to COVID-19. Additionally, the US should eliminate intellectual property constraints like patents and trade agreements that might restrict the low-cost production and distribution of essential drugs and vaccines, including those developed from publicly-funded research. Finally, we call for an end to the racist and xenophobic rhetoric that sows division and undermines cooperation.

The steps outlined above focus on public health and medical measures. With recession on the horizon, however, additional measures are needed to ameliorate impoverishment and social dislocation. Mass unemployment and economic privation will harm the nation’s health unless sweeping measures to strengthen the social safety-net are enacted. Such steps go beyond the scope of this document, but are critical for protecting the health and welfare of our patients.

There is much uncertainty in how severe the COVID-19 outbreak will ultimately prove to be in the United States. The rapid rise of cases and deaths, however, gives little reason for optimism. While no single policy could have prevented this outbreak, a robust, adequately-funded public health infrastructure and adherence to science-based policy — together with a universal publicly-funded national health program with unified financing and governance — would be powerful tools to control it. Change is sorely needed: to protect our patients during this pandemic, and other threats that will follow.

---

Addendum: Protect residents and staff of long-term care facilities

Note: This important step does not appear in the original Boston Review piece; it was developed by the Illinois Single-Payer Coalition Working Group on Long-Term Care and added to PNHP’s proposal in early 2021.

Residents of long-term care facilities, like residents of other congregate settings, have suffered disproportionate numbers of COVID-19 infections and deaths.²⁸

Even before the pandemic, infection control, staffing ratios, and public health surveillance were inadequate, and injuries and deaths due to abuse and neglect were commonplace. All of these conditions have worsened during the pandemic.

Long-term care facility staff have also suffered illness and death.

Disability rights activists have fought for decades for the right to live in the community, with necessary services and supports, instead of in institutions.²⁹ The pandemic proves the urgency of their demands.

PNHP’s 1991 proposal for a national long-term care program³⁰ supported the demand for home and community-based services (HCBS), as has national improved Medicare for all legislation.

PNHP urges Congress to continue to include support for HCBS in the federal response to the pandemic; and urges the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to issue guidance that explicitly enables local agencies to use appropriate HCBS funding for emergency relocation of residents of long-term care facilities and other congregate settings into safer housing, with needed supports.

Universal coverage of long-term care under Medicare for all would assure equitable funding of HCBS throughout the country.

---

References

1. Cohen RA, Terlizzi EP, Martinez ME. Health Insurance Coverage: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, 2018 [Internet]. National Center for Health Statistics; 2019. [cited 2019 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov…
2. Collins SR, Bhupal HK, Doty MM. Health Insurance Coverage Eight Years After the ACA: Fewer Uninsured Americans and Shorter Coverage Gaps, But More Underinsured [Internet]. Commonwealth Fund; 2019. [cited 2019 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.commonwealthfund.org…
3. Himmelstein DU, Lawless RM, Thorne D, Foohey P, Woolhandler S. Medical Bankruptcy: Still Common Despite the Affordable Care Act. Am J Public Health 2019;109(3):431–3.
4. Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S. A National Health Program for the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 1989;320(2):102–8.
5. Gaffney A, Woolhandler S, Angell M, Himmelstein DU. Moving Forward From the Affordable Care Act to a Single-Payer System. Am J Public Health 2016;106(6):987–8.
6. Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU, Angell M, Young QD, Physicians’ Working Group for Single-Payer National Health Insurance. Proposal of the Physicians’ Working Group for Single-Payer National Health Insurance. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2003;290(6):798–805.
7. Potential costs of coronavirus treatment for people with employer coverage [Internet]. Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker. [cited 2020 Mar 22]; Available from: https://www.healthsystemtracker.org…
8. Abrams A. Total Cost of Her COVID-19 Treatment: $34,927.43 [Internet]. Time. [cited 2020 Mar 22]; Available from: https://time.com…
9. Khandelwal N, White L, Curtis JR, Coe NB. Health Insurance and Out-of-Pocket Costs in the Last Year of Life Among Decedents Utilizing the ICU. Critical Care Medicine 2019;47(6):749.
10. Himmelstein DU, Campbell T, Woolhandler S. Health Care Administrative Costs in the United States and Canada, 2017. [Internet] Ann Intern Med; 2020. [cited 2020 Jan 9]; Available from: https://annals.org…
11. Himmelstein DU, Woolhandler S. Public Health’s Falling Share of US Health Spending. Am J Public Health 2016;106(1):56–7.
12. Report: Public health funding falls despite increasing threats [Internet]. Modern Healthcare; 2019. [cited 2020 Mar 19]; Available from: https://www.modernhealthcare.com…
13. Leider JP, Coronado F, Beck AJ, Harper E. Reconciling Supply and Demand for State and Local Public Health Staff in an Era of Retiring Baby Boomers. Am J Prev Med 2018;54(3):334–40.
14. Dolan J, Mejia B. L.A. County gives up on containing coronavirus, tells doctors to skip testing of some patients [Internet]. Los Angeles Times; 2020. [cited 2020 Mar 22]; Available from: https://www.latimes.com…
15. Legido-Quigley H, Asgari N, Teo YY, et al. Are high-performing health systems resilient against the COVID-19 epidemic? [Internet] The Lancet; 2020. [cited 2020 Mar 7]; Available from: https://www.thelancet.com…
16. Press A. Coronavirus: 38 test positive in New York City jails, including Rikers Island [Internet]. The Guardian; 2020. [cited 2020 Mar 22]; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com…
17. Lander B. Doctors in NYC Hospitals, Jails, and Shelters Call on the City to Take More Aggressive Action to… [Internet]. Medium; 2020. [cited 2020 Mar 18]; Available from: https://medium.com…
18. Zallman L, Finnegan KE, Himmelstein DU, Touw S, Woolhandler S. Implications of Changing Public Charge Immigration Rules for Children Who Need Medical Care. JAMA Pediatr 2019;e191744–e191744.
19. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Public Charge [Internet]. USCIS; 2020. [cited 2020 Mar 15]; Available from: https://www.uscis.gov…
20. Physicians for Human Rights, Human Rights First, Amnesty International USA. Re: COVID-19 and Immigrant Detention [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2020 Mar 22]; Available from: https://www.humanrightsfirst.org…
21. Weber L. Coronavirus Threatens The Lives Of Rural Hospitals Already Stretched To Breaking Point [Internet]. Kaiser Health News; 2020. [cited 2020 Mar 22]; Available from: https://khn.org…
22. Rovner J. In Coronavirus Relief Bill, Hospitals Poised To Get Massive Infusion Of Cash [Internet]. Kaiser Health News; 2020. [cited 2020 Mar 30]; Available from: https://khn.org…
23. Lucas JH Elizabeth. ‘UVA Has Ruined Us’: Health System Sues Thousands Of Patients, Seizing Paychecks And Claiming Homes [Internet]. Kaiser Health News; 2019. [cited 2019 Nov 22]; Available from: https://khn.org…
24. Himmelstein DU, Jun M, Busse R, et al. A Comparison Of Hospital Administrative Costs In Eight Nations: US Costs Exceed All Others By Far. Health Affairs 2014;33(9):1586–94.
25. Lerner S. Big Pharma Prepares to Profit From the Coronavirus [Internet]. The Intercept; 2020. [cited 2020 Mar 15]; Available from: https://theintercept.com…
26. Gaffney A, Lexchin J, The US/Canadian Pharmaceutical Policy Reform Working Group. Healing an ailing pharmaceutical system: Prescription for reform for United States and Canada. BMJ 2018;361:k1039.
27. Holden E. US prescription drug supply chains face coronavirus stress test [Internet]. The Guardian; 2020. [cited 2020 Mar 23]; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com…
28. Chidambaram P, Garfield R. Patterns in COVID-19 Cases and Deaths in Long-Term Care Facilities in 2020 [Internet]. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2021. [cited 2021 Aug 12]; Available from: https://www.kff.org…
29. Powell R. Disability Activists Fight for the Right to Live in Their Communities [Internet]. Rewire News Group; 2018. [cited 2021 Aug 12]; Available from: https://rewirenewsgroup.com…
30. Harrington C, Cassel C, Estes CL, Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. A National Long-term Care Program for the United States: A Caring Vision. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 1991;266(21):3023-3029.

---

Social media graphics

Throughout 2020, PNHP will focus on a specific, concrete “kitchen table” issue that requires fundamental reform (like single payer), not minor tweaks (like a public option). See below for materials related to our spring topic, pandemics and public health emergencies, and scroll to the bottom for a list of additional topics.

Public health emergencies (Spring 2020)

The COVID-19 pandemic has laid bare the glaring inadequacies of U.S. health care, as the threat of medical bills deters low-income patients from seeking treatment, our profit-driven delivery system strains to accommodate a surge in demand, and millions stand to lose their employer-provided health coverage. It also shows how badly we need fundamental reform.

We encourage you to share the materials below with your colleagues, family members, friends, and neighbors during the spring of 2020 to remind them that public health emergencies like COVID-19 are a kitchen table issue…and that Medicare for All is a necessary part of the solution.

Complete public health emergencies toolkit

• One-page handout: Medicare for All and public health emergencies
• Comparison chart: Medicare for All vs. the status quo
• PowerPoint slides: Now more than ever we need single-payer Medicare for All (by PNHP-MO chair Dr. Ed Weisbart)
• PowerPoint slides: COVID capitalism and the fight for health care justice
  and societal transformation (by PNHP co-founder Dr. Steffie Woolhandler)
• PowerPoint slides: A case for improved and expanded Medicare for All (by PNHP NY Metro fellow and SNaHP leader Rachel Madley)
  
• Webinar: Dr. Phil Verhoef on public health emergencies
• Webinar: Dr. Steffie Woolhandler on COVID capitalism and the fight for health care justice and societal transformation
• Webinar: Dr. Alan Meyers on Medicare for All in the context of COVID-19
• Webinar: Dr. Kenneth Engelhart on pandemics throughout history
• Webinar: Pandemics and single payer (organized by the UC Berkeley-UCSF joint medical program chapter of Students for a National Health Program)
• Webinar: COVID-19 and the problems with employer-based health care (organized by the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health chapter of Students for a National Health Program)
• Virtual Panel: Prof. Karen Palmer and Dr. Sanjeev Sriram on COVID-19 and the case for Medicare for All (organized by the Medicare for All Congressional Caucus)
• Organizing toolkit: Telling your story
• Analysis: “Unprepared for COVID-19: How the Pandemic Makes the Case for Medicare for All,” by Eagan Kemp, Health Care Policy Advocate, Public Citizen
• Newspaper outreach: Sample letters to the editor
• Radio outreach: Talk radio call-in scripts
• Video: Dr. Phil Verhoef on COVID-19 and Medicare for All
• Podcast: Dr. David Himmelstein on our response to COVID-19
• Social media: Share on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram

If you need assistance with events or actions, contact the PNHP organizing team at organizer@pnhp.org. For help with messaging materials, contact PNHP communications specialist Clare Fauke at clare@pnhp.org.

If you would like to provide expertise or help develop materials for future Kitchen Table topics, please contact PNHP president-elect Dr. Susan Rogers at s.rogers@pnhp.org.

Video: Dr. Phil Verhoef on COVID-19

Podcast: Dr. David Himmelstein on COVID-19

Webinar: Dr. Phil Verhoef on COVID-19

Webinar: Dr. Steffie Woolhandler on COVID capitalism and the fight for health care justice and societal transformation

Webinar: Dr. Alan Meyers on Medicare for All in the context of COVID-19

Webinar: Overcoming COVID-19: A historical perspective

Webinar: Pandemics and single payer

Webinar: COVID-19 and the problems with employer-based health care

Virtual Panel: Prof. Karen Palmer and Dr. Sanjeev Sriram on COVID-19 and the case for Medicare for All

Twitter discussion forum

PNHP hosted a one-hour COVID-19 Twitter discussion on April 9, 2020, featuring PNHP president Dr. Adam Gaffney, PNHP president-elect Dr. Susan Rogers, and other notable physician and health professional leaders. All questions and responses are all included in the thread below.

Join us TONIGHT at 8pm Eastern as we talk #COVID19 and #MedicareForAll.

(And be sure to follow @awgaffney, @SusanRogersMD1, @DrSriram, @DrDooleyMD, @AugieLindmark, @karenpalmeryvr, and @ThomasJxnMPH if you aren’t already.)#COVID19Response #SinglePayerSavesLives pic.twitter.com/dpfKMv0bDL

— Physicians for a National Health Program (@PNHP) April 9, 2020

Additional topics

Review previous installments of the Kitchen Table Campaign, and stay tuned for additional topics throughout 2020:

• • Surprise billing (January)
  • Racial health inequities (February)
  • Rural health (March)
  • Pandemics and public health emergencies (Spring)
  • COVID-19 and racial health inequities (Spring)
  • COVID-19 endangers health care workers (July)
  • COVID-19 and delays for non-COVID care (future)
  • COVID-19 and unmet mental health needs (future)
  • High drug prices (future)
  • Substance abuse and opioids (future)
  • Maternal and reproductive health (future)

As health professionals, policymakers, and patients continue to grapple with COVID-19, you may be asking, “What can I do right now to help advance the cause of health care justice?”

In addition to following CDC guidelines on social distancing, we encourage you to take the following 10 steps to address the current crisis, and to build a system that will make us healthier, more just, and better prepared for future public health crises.

1. Contact lapsed PNHP members and urge them to renew their membership. Email admin@pnhp.org for a list of lapsed members in your community.
2. Maintain your Medicare for All advocacy using tools such as videoconferencing and phone trees. See PNHP’s Digital Organizing Swaps guide for detailed suggestions.
3. Share information from reliable sources, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and PNHP’s dedicated coronavirus page, on social media.
4. Call attention to the needs of marginalized communities, including undocumented immigrants, tribal populations, and people with disabilities. Go HERE for a list of resources.
5. Share your story as someone on the front lines of this pandemic. Americans are scared and frustrated, and they want to hear from medical professionals who are fighting COVID-19. Use THIS organizing toolkit to get started.
6. Read, sign, and share THIS important letter from the Committee to Protect Medicare demanding widespread COVID-19 testing, a national shelter-in-place order, and increased production of personal protective equipment.
7. Write an op-ed or letter to the editor of your local news outlet explaining how Medicare for All would improve our response to public health emergencies. Go HERE for letter and op-ed guidelines.
8. Call your congressional representatives at (202) 224-3121 and urge them to fight for free testing and treatment for COVID-19 patients. Also, urge them to co-sponsor single-payer legislation, such as H.R. 1384 in the House and S. 1129 in the Senate.
9. Support the future of our movement by encouraging a medical or health professional student to join Students for a National Health Program (SNaHP) for FREE. You can also encourage active SNaHP members to apply for a leadership position.
10. Help sustain the cause of health care justice by pledging a generous monthly contribution. Visit pnhp.org/donate TODAY!

Together, we will strive to contain the spread of this virus, treat patients in need of medical intervention, and win the single-payer system that all Americans need and deserve.

Wash your hands. Practice social distancing. And fight for a single-payer national health program that can address public health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. Our fractured and inefficient collection of private and public health programs leaves millions of Americans out in the cold. A well-designed national health program would cover every U.S. resident and would ensure timely care for those who need it most.

Protecting public health during the immediate crisis

For the latest information on the COVID-19 pandemic, including recommended mitigation techniques, visit the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website.

Read, sign, and share this important letter from the Committee to Protect Medicare demanding widespread COVID-19 testing, a national shelter-in-place order, and increased production of personal protective equipment.

For a continuously updated list of resources available to undocumented immigrants, see this Google Sheet compiled by the Betancourt Macias Family Scholarship Foundation.

For a continuously updated list of resources available to people with disabilities, see this dedicated webpage compiled by Access Living.

Coronavirus-related policy proposals and research

Physicians for a National Health Program has developed an eight-point plan of needed steps to fight COVID-19 including, but not limited to, single-payer Medicare for All. Our proposal was published in Boston Review, and can also be found at pnhp.org/COVID19Response.

PNHP leaders and allies have also published several studies detailing how job loss, chronic health conditions, mass incarceration, and other inequities put millions at risk of contracting, and dying from, COVID-19:

• “We Are All in This Together: COVID-19 and the Case for Medicare for All,” by Hebah Kassem, Congressional Progressive Caucus Center, March 2021.
• “Unprepared for COVID-19: How the Pandemic Makes the Case for Medicare for All,” by Eagan Kemp, Public Citizen, March 16, 2021. (Public Citizen press release here.)
• “Risk for Severe COVID-19 Illness Among Teachers and Adults Living With School-Aged Children,” by Adam W. Gaffney, M.D., M.P.H.; David U. Himmelstein, M.D.; and Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., M.P.H., Annals of Internal Medicine, August 21, 2020. (PNHP press release here.)
• “Illness-Related Work Absence in Mid-April Was Highest on Record,” by Adam W. Gaffney, M.D., M.P.H.; David U. Himmelstein, M.D.; and Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., M.P.H., JAMA Internal Medicine, published online July 27, 2020. (PNHP press release here.)
• “Feasibility of Separate Rooms for Home Isolation and Quarantine for COVID-19 in the United States,” by Ashwini R. Sehgal, M.D.; David U. Himmelstein, M.D.; and Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., M.P.H., Annals of Internal Medicine, published online July 21, 2020. (PNHP press release here.)
• “18.2 Million Individuals at Increased Risk of Severe COVID-19 Illness Are Un- or Underinsured,” by Adam W. Gaffney, M.D., M.P.H.; Laura Hawks, M.D.; David H. Bor, M.D.; Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., M.P.H.; David U. Himmelstein, M.D.; and Danny McCormick, M.D., Journal of General Internal Medicine, published online June 10, 2020. (PNHP press release here.)
• “COVID-19 and US Health Financing: Perils and Possibilities,” by Adam Gaffney, M.D., M.P.H.; David U. Himmelstein, M.D.; and Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., M.P.H., International Journal of Health Services, published online June 9, 2020. (Full study on the PNHP website here.)
• “Insurers’ Offers of Free Care for Coronavirus Are Often Confusing and Limited,” by Eagan Kemp, Melinda St. Louis, Taylor Lincoln, and Mike Tanglis, Public Citizen, May 7, 2020.
• “Health Insurance Status and Risk Factors for Poor Outcomes with COVID-19 Among U.S. Health Care Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study,” by David U. Himmelstein, M.D. and Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., M.P.H., Annals of Internal Medicine, April 28, 2020. (PNHP press release here.)
  
• “COVID-19 in Prisons and Jails in the United States,” by Laura Hawks, M.D.; Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., M.P.H.; and Danny McCormick, M.D., M.P.H., JAMA Internal Medicine, published online April 28, 2020. (PNHP press release here.)
• “Intersecting U.S. Epidemics: COVID-19 and Lack of Health Insurance,” by Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., M.P.H., F.A.C.P. and David U. Himmelstein, M.D., F.A.C.P., Annals of Internal Medicine, published online April 7, 2020. (PNHP press release here.)

In response to the current crisis, PNHP recommends enrolling all currently uninsured U.S. residents in traditional Medicare, a time-tested program that already covers tens of millions of Americans.

Why we need improved Medicare for All

Whatever public health measures we can put in place to address COVID-19 are sadly limited by the awful state of our health care financing apparatus, and by the threadbare nature of our social safety net.

Congress can have a positive immediate impact by passing protections for workers, creating medical “sanctuaries” for undocumented immigrants, and eliminating out-of-pocket expenses for patients undergoing testing and treatment for COVID-19. But the only permanent solution is to enact a single-payer national health program that would:

• Cover all U.S. residents for all medically necessary care;
• Totally eliminate out-of-pocket spending;
• Guarantee appropriate health resources in all communities based on medical need;
• Increase public health spending and invest in research to improve population health; and
• Maintain the capacity to respond to nationwide crises in a unified manner.

COVID-19 is just one dramatic example of our failure to care for vulnerable patients and marginalized populations. To the extent that Congress passes laudable reforms, those reforms should not be allowed to expire, but should act as a catalyst in our push for single-payer reform.

If a concerted focus on public health is required to address the current crisis, then it is also required to address the ongoing crisis.

Organizing during the COVID-19 pandemic

As large public gatherings are cancelled across the country, PNHP activists are no doubt wondering how to safely maintain their vital single-payer advocacy in the age of “social distancing.” Our organizing team has developed two important guides for members to continue their work remotely:

• “Digital Organizing Swaps: An action plan for activists during COVID-19” details digital alternatives to planned in-person activities such as chapter meetings and canvassing events.
• “How to run a large conference call” provides tips for members to help make upcoming conference calls a success, including steps to take before, during, and after your call.
• “Zoom tips and tricks” will help members make the most of the Zoom video conferencing platform. Developed by Shannon Rotolo, PharmD.

If you have questions about organizing amidst COVID-19, email our organizing team at organizer@pnhp.org.

During each of the first six months of 2020, PNHP will focus on a specific, concrete “kitchen table” issue that requires fundamental reform (like single payer), not minor tweaks (like a public option). See below for materials related to this month’s issue, rural health care, and scroll to the bottom for a list of future topics.

Rural health care (March 2020)

The corporations that control U.S. health care are neglecting rural communities. Why? Because they are driven by profits, and seek to deliver expensive care to a large populations of privately insured patients. Rural hospitals are closing at an alarming rate, and residents of these communities are suffering greatly as a result.

We encourage you to share the materials below with your colleagues, family members, friends, and neighbors during the month of March to remind them that our rural health crisis is a kitchen table issue…and that Medicare for All is a necessary part of the solution.

Complete rural health crisis toolkit

• One-page handout: Overview of our rural health crisis
• Comparison chart: Medicare for All vs. public option
• PowerPoint slides: Medicare for All means far better rural health
• Newspaper outreach: Sample letters to the editor
• Radio outreach: Talk radio call-in scripts
• Organizing toolkit: Rural American Health Care
• Social media: Share on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram
• Video: Dr. Carol Paris on our rural health crisis
• Facts and data sources: Resources on our rural health crisis (also available in PDF and MS Word)
• Podcast: Dr. Bob Devereaux on our rural health crisis
• Webinar: Dr. Bob Devereaux answers member questions
• News coverage: Dr. Robin Feierabend speaks to The Daily Yonder about rural hospital closures

If you need assistance with events or actions, contact the PNHP organizing team at organizer@pnhp.org. For help with messaging materials, contact PNHP communications specialist Clare Fauke at clare@pnhp.org.

If you would like to provide expertise or help develop materials for future Kitchen Table topics, please contact PNHP Strategy Committee co-coordinator Dr. Ed Weisbart at pnhpmo@gmail.com.

Video: Dr. Carol Paris on rural health care

Video: Dr. Anna Stratis on rural health care

Podcast: Dr. Bob Devereaux on our rural health crisis

Webinar: Dr. Bob Devereaux answers member questions

Additional topics

Stay tuned for these topics throughout the first half of 2020:

• Surprise billing (January)
• Racial health inequities (February)
• Rural health (March)
• COVID-19 and public health emergencies (April)
• High drug prices (May)
• Substance abuse and opiods (June)
• Maternal and reproductive health (July)

On February 15, 2020, medical and health professional students from across the U.S. gathered in Aurora, Colo. for the 9th annual Students for a National Health Program (SNaHP) Summit. To access a selection of slideshows and handouts from the Summit, please see below. To view photos from the Summit, visit our Flickr page.

We also encouraged attendees to post to social media using the hashtag #SNaHPSummit2020. Click here to read member tweets, and be sure to follow SNaHP on Facebook and Twitter for regular updates.

Summit Agenda

Click here to access the full agenda.

Click here to access workshop descriptions.

Presentation Materials

Single Payer 101
By Alex Cabrera, Rachel Madley, Paul Glasheen, Ashley Duhon, and Michael Zingman
Download slideshow here

Welcome and Keynote
By Dr. Susan Rogers
Download slideshow here

Working with Media: Pitching Your Story and Conducting Interviews
By Clare Fauke
Download slideshow here

Single Payer & its Impacts on Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Treatment
By Michael Zingman
Download slideshow here

Serving on & Creating a Panel Discussion: How to use your voice in a crowded room
By Stephanie Michael and Robertha Barnes
Download slideshow here

Rural Health Inequities and How it Applies to Single Payer
By Akul Munjal
Download slideshow here

The AMA Action & Medical Society Resolutions
By Alankrita Siddula and Rex Tai
Download slideshow here

Electoral & Political Advocacy in a Critical Election Year
By Keanan McGonigle, Paul Ehrlich, and John Kearney
Download slideshow here and here

Regional Breakout Sessions
Download student toolkit here, and access voter registration information here and here

Plenary Sessions

Single Payer 101
By Alex Cabrera, Rachel Madley, Paul Glasheen, Ashley Duhon, and Michael Zingman (the keynote address by Dr. Susan Rogers is also included, but there is an even better recording below)

Keynote Address: The Fight for Health Care Has Always Been about Civil Rights
By Dr. Susan Rogers

Panel: “What does ‘All Means All’ Mean?”
Featuring Alankrita Siddula, Helio Neves da Silva, and Thomas Jackson; Moderated by Robertha Barnes

Panel: With a Workers’ Conscious: Unionizing Now and Under Medicare for All 
Featuring Dr. Jessica Edwards, Ashley Duhon, and Clare Fauke; Moderated by Rosa Malloy-Post and Paul Glasheen

Super Tuesday Action

Check back soon for more details on our student-led Super Tuesday action. (Super Tuesday is March 3, 2020.)

During each of the first six months of 2020, PNHP will focus on a specific, concrete “kitchen table” issue that requires fundamental reform (like single payer), not minor tweaks (like a public option). See below for materials related to this month’s issue, racial health inequities, and scroll to the bottom for a list of future topics.

Racial health inequities (February 2020)

People of color face significant barriers accessing health care in the United States, and are much more likely than whites to be uninsured or under-insured. The results are tragic: higher rates of preventable illness resulting in physical suffering, bankruptcy, and even death. We have a long way to go to eliminate the racial inequities in U.S. health care, but a necessary first step is comprehensive coverage for everybody.

We encourage you to share the materials below with your colleagues, family members, friends, and neighbors during the month of February to remind them that racial health inequities are a kitchen table issue…and that Medicare for All is a necessary part of the solution.

Complete racial health inequities toolkit

• One-page handout: Overview of racial health inequities
• Comparison chart: Medicare for All vs. public option
• PowerPoint slides: Medicare for All means far fewer racial health disparities (click here to view video of Dr. Ed Weisbart presenting these slides at West Chestnut Street Baptist Church in Louisville)
• Newspaper outreach: Sample letters to the editor
• Radio outreach: Talk radio call-in scripts
• Organizing toolkit: Update your Grand Rounds or speaking presentation
• Organizing toolkit: Planning a virtual townhall on racial health inequities (developed by Students for a National Health Program)
• Social media: Share on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram
• Video: Dr. Susan Rogers on racial health inequities
• Podcast: Dr. Susan Rogers on racial health inequities
• Webinar: Dr. Susan Rogers answers member questions

If you need assistance with events or actions, contact the PNHP organizing team at organizer@pnhp.org. For help with messaging materials, contact PNHP communications specialist Clare Fauke at clare@pnhp.org.

If you would like to provide expertise or help develop materials for future Kitchen Table topics, please contact PNHP Strategy Committee co-coordinator Dr. Ed Weisbart at pnhpmo@gmail.com.

Video: Dr. Susan Rogers on racial health inequities

Video: Dr. Ed Weisbart on racial health inequities

Podcast: Dr. Susan Rogers on racial health inequities

Webinar: Dr. Susan Rogers answers member questions

Webinar: Dr. Sanjeev Sriram on the All Means All campaign, plus SNaHP racial justice toolkit

Action: Power to Heal screening

PNHP chapters across the country have drawn large and engaged audiences by screening “Power to Heal: Medicare and the Civil Rights Revolution.” Visit the Power to Heal website to purchase a license for the film, or contact Dr. Jessica Schorr Saxe with PNHP’s Health Care Justice – North Carolina chapter (jessica.schorr.saxe@gmail.com) for suggestions on how to organize a successful screening.

Allied organizations fighting for racial justice

Our allies in the fight for single-payer Medicare for All have developed materials and campaigns focusing on racial justice, including the following:

• Social Security Works developed the All Means All campaign to center racial equity and the elimination of racial health disparities in the creation of Medicare for All. Visit the campaign website to join their efforts, view a webinar featuring Dr. Sanjeev K. Sriram, and access racial justice fact sheets for all 50 states.
• Healthcare-NOW! produced a video detailing the role of racism and Jim Crow in defeating previous single-payer legislation. The organization is currently developing a racial equity training that will be free and open to the public.
• White Coats for Black Lives seeks to eliminate racial bias in the practice of medicine and recognize racism as a threat to the health and well-being of people of color. Their recent work includes a Racial Justice Report Card that evaluated medical schools across the U.S.

Additional topics

Stay tuned for these topics throughout the first half of 2020:

• Surprise billing (January)
• Racial health inequities (February)
• Rural health (March)
• Substance abuse and opiods (April)
• Maternal and reproductive health (May)
• High drug prices (June)

During each of the first six months of 2020, PNHP will focus on a specific, concrete “kitchen table” issue that requires fundamental reform (like single payer), not minor tweaks (like a public option). See below for materials related to January’s issue, surprise billing, and scroll to the bottom for a list of additional topics.

Surprise medical bills (January 2020)

More than half of Americans say they’ve been hit with a “surprise” medical bill that they thought would have been covered by insurance. These bills are more than just an inconvenience; they can stretch family budgets to the breaking point and the fear of surprise medical bills can cause patients to avoid seeking care in the first place.

We encourage you to share the materials below with your colleagues, family members, friends, and neighbors during the month of January to remind them that surprise billing is a kitchen table issue…and Medicare for All is the only real solution.

Complete surprise billing toolkit

• One-page handout: Overview of surprise billing
• Comparison chart: Medicare for All vs. public option
• PowerPoint slides: An end to surprise medical bills
• Newspaper outreach: Sample op-ed and letters-to-the-editor
• Radio outreach: Talk radio call-in scripts
• Organizing toolkit: Send a surprise bill to your member of Congress
• Social media: Share on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram
• Video: Dr. Farzon Nahvi on surprise billing
• Podcast: Dr. Mark Krasnoff on surprise billing
• Webinar: Dr. Mark Krasnoff answers member questions

If you need assistance with events or actions, contact the PNHP organizing team at organizer@pnhp.org. For help with messaging materials, contact PNHP communications specialist Clare Fauke at clare@pnhp.org.

If you would like to provide expertise or help develop materials for future Kitchen Table topics, please contact PNHP Strategy Committee co-coordinator Dr. Ed Weisbart at pnhpmo@gmail.com.

Video: Dr. Farzon Nahvi on surprise billing

Podcast: Dr. Mark Krasnoff on surprise billing

Webinar: Dr. Mark Krasnoff answers member questions

Member writing

• “Protecting Americans from surprise medical costs” by Ed Weisbart, M.D., St. Louis Post-Dispatch, January 8, 2020
• “We have a way to get rid of these surprise medical bills” by George Bohmfalk, M.D., The Aspen (Colo.) Times, March 3, 2020
• “Insurance networks have to go” by Valerie Domenici, Ph.D., The Sentinel (Carlisle, Penn.), Letters, January 8, 2020
• “Medicare for All plan would cover all Americans and is a way forward” by Kathleen Fagan, M.D., M.P.H., TCPalm (Stuart, Fla.), Letters, January 8, 2020
• “The answer to surprise medical billing is Medicare for All” by Johnathon Ross, M.D., M.P.H., The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer, Letters, January 15, 2020
• “This is why I prescribe Medicare for All” by Joan A. MacEachen, M.D., M.P.H., The Journal (Cortez, Colo.), Letters, January 16, 2020
• “Universal health care the cure for medical billing disorders” by Eric Naumburg, M.D., M.P.H., The Baltimore Sun, Letters, March 2, 2020

Future topics

Stay tuned for additional topics throughout the first half of 2020:

• Surprise billing (January)
• Racial health inequities (February)
• Rural health (March)
• Substance abuse and opiods (April)
• Maternal and reproductive health (May)
• High drug prices (June)